Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Scott (1978)
Identification of individual Bewick’s swans by bill patterns
(1996)
A new survey protocol for capture - recapture studies in humpback whale winter grounds
J. Goodall (1986)
The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior
J. Petersen (1972)
An identification system for zebra (Equus burchelli, Gray)African Journal of Ecology, 10
T. Caro, S. Durant (1991)
Use of Quantitative Analyses of Pelage Characteristics to Reveal Family Resemblances in Genetically Monomorphic CheetahsJournal of Heredity, 82
M. Hindell, M. Lea, C. Hull (2008)
The effects of flipper bands on adult survival rate and reproduction in the Royal Penguin
N. Nur (1991)
LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN BIRDSEvolution, 45
Van Gelder, G. Richard (1973)
The Serengeti LionBioScience, 23
M. Kelly, S. Durant (2000)
Viability of the Serengeti Cheetah PopulationConservation Biology, 14
K. Lorenz (1937)
The Companion in the Bird's WorldThe Auk, 54
R. Huele, H. Haes (1998)
IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL SPERM WHALES BY WAVELET TRANSFORM OF THE TRAILING EDGE OF THE FLUKESMarine Mammal Science, 14
J. Foster (1966)
THE GIRAFFE OF NAIROBI NATIONAL PARK: HOME RANGE, SEX RATIOS, THE HERD, AND FOODAfrican Journal of Ecology, 4
M. Daly, Margo Wilson, Philip Behrends, L. Jacobs (1992)
Sexually differentiated effects of radio transmitters on predation risk and behaviour in kangaroo rats Dipodomys merriamiCanadian Journal of Zoology, 70
(1986)
Male cheetahs of the Serengeti
I. Cuthill (1991)
Field experiments in animal behaviour: methods and ethicsAnimal Behaviour, 42
M. Kelly (2001)
Lineage Loss in Serengeti Cheetahs: Consequences of High Reproductive Variance and Heritability of Fitness on Effective Population SizeConservation Biology, 15
(2001)
An automated system for matching the callosity patterns in aerial photographs of southern right whales
S. Dufault, H. Whitehead (1995)
AN ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES WITH TIME IN THE MARKING PATTERNS USED FOR PHOTOIDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL SPERM WHALES, PHYSETER MACROCEPHALUSMarine Mammal Science, 11
G. Mowat, B. Slough, René Rivard (1994)
A COMPARISON OF THREE LIVE CAPTURING DEVICES FOR LYNX: CAPTURE EFFICIENCY AND INJURIES
T. Caro (1994)
Cheetahs of the Serengeti Plains: Group Living in an Asocial Species
R. Sokal, F. Rohlf, Freeman, Co. (1969)
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
M. Delany (1978)
Introduction: marking animals for research
I. Douglas-Hamilton (1973)
On the ecology and behaviour of the Lake Manyara elephantsAfrican Journal of Ecology, 11
M. Kelly, M. Laurenson, C. Fitzgibbon, D. Collins, S. Durant, George, W. Frame, B. Bertram, T. Caro (1998)
Demography of the Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) population: the first 25 yearsJournal of Zoology, 244
(1990)
Computer aided matching of natural markings : A prototype system for grey seals
Photographic identification of naturally marked animals is a powerful and nonintrusive technique for obtaining information on behavior, population size, and life-history parameters in wild populations. Yet handling large quantities of photographs is time consuming and prone to error. Computer-aided matching can limit the number of photographs that must be examined visually to confirm that 2 sightings are the same individual. To identify individuals, I used a 3-dimensional (3-D) computer-matching system to aid in matching nearly 10,000 photographs of Serengeti cheetahs, Acinonyx jubatus, taken over 25 years. Accuracy in matching 2 photographs increased to 100% as the computer-generated similarity coefficient increased to 0.600 on a scale from 0 to 1. Probability of missing a match decreased to 6.4% when I used a threshold of similarity of 0.450. Poor quality of photographs decreased accuracy and resulted in up to 33% of matches being missed. Comparisons of photographs at skewed camera angles generally reduced similarity coefficients. Similarity coefficients were no higher for related or unrelated animals, suggesting that the technique is not appropriate for distinguishing subtle similarities. Because 3-D computer-aided matching does not require familiarity with distinctive features of the particular study animal, it is robust to matcher inexperience. This technique can be modified for other species that have complex and variable pelage patterns.
Journal of Mammalogy – Oxford University Press
Published: May 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.