Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Shuman (1989)
History of Numerical Weather Prediction at the National Meteorological CenterWeather and Forecasting, 4
(2002)
Het weer nader verklaard: Neerslagkans [The Weather Explained: Precipitation Chances
D. Budescu, T. Wallsten (1995)
Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical EvidencePsychology of Learning and Motivation, 32
Gerd Gigerenzer (2002)
Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You
Monahan Monahan, Steadman Steadman (1996)
Violent storms and violent peopleAmerican Psychologist, 51
J. Monahan, H. Steadman (1996)
Violent storms and violent people: How meteorology can inform risk communication in mental health law.American Psychologist, 51
R. Keeney, D. Winterfeldt (1986)
Improving risk communication.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 6 4
Koehler Koehler (1996)
On conveying the probative value of DNA evidence: Frequencies, likelihood ratios, and error ratesUniversity of Colorado Law Review, 67
W. Sherden (1997)
The Fortune Sellers: The Big Business of Buying and Selling Predictions
J. Thornes, D. Stephenson (2001)
How to judge the quality and value of weather forecast productsMeteorological Applications, 8
(1992)
Kans op regen
(2003)
Prognose der Niederschlagswahrscheinlichkeit: Modelle und Verifikation [Precipitation Probability Forecasting: Models and Verification
A. Murphy, R. Winkler (1971)
forecasters and probability forecasts: some current problems1,2Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 52
P. Lachenbruch (1989)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84
A. Murphy, S. Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff, R. Winkler (1980)
Misinterpretations of precipitation probability forecastsBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 61
G. Gigerenzer, U. Hoffrage, Heinz Kleinbölting (1991)
Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.Psychological review, 98 4
J. Thornes (2007)
The quality and accuracy of a sample of public and commercial weather forecasts in the UKMeteorological Applications, 3
(2003)
Retrieved December 4
P. Slovic, J. Monahan, D. MacGregor (2000)
Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency FormatsLaw and Human Behavior, 24
J. Koehler (1996)
On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios and Error RatesInnovation Law & Policy eJournal
The weather forecast says that there is a “30% chance of rain,” and we think we understand what it means. This quantitative statement is assumed to be unambiguous and to convey more information than does a qualitative statement like “It might rain tomorrow.” Because the forecast is expressed as a single‐event probability, however, it does not specify the class of events it refers to. Therefore, even numerical probabilities can be interpreted by members of the public in multiple, mutually contradictory ways. To find out whether the same statement about rain probability evokes various interpretations, we randomly surveyed pedestrians in five metropolises located in countries that have had different degrees of exposure to probabilistic forecasts––Amsterdam, Athens, Berlin, Milan, and New York. They were asked what a “30% chance of rain tomorrow” means both in a multiple‐choice and a free‐response format. Only in New York did a majority of them supply the standard meteorological interpretation, namely, that when the weather conditions are like today, in 3 out of 10 cases there will be (at least a trace of) rain the next day. In each of the European cities, this alternative was judged as the least appropriate. The preferred interpretation in Europe was that it will rain tomorrow “30% of the time,” followed by “in 30% of the area.” To improve risk communication with the public, experts need to specify the reference class, that is, the class of events to which a single‐event probability refers.
Risk Analysis – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.