Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Static and cyclic creep behaviour of 2024/SiCp and its matrix alloy at high temperature

Static and cyclic creep behaviour of 2024/SiCp and its matrix alloy at high temperature The tensile creep and tensile-tensile cyclic creep behaviour of 2024/SiCp composite and its matrix alloy have been investigated and analysed at high temperature. It was found that the creep threshold stress of the composite may not be caused by SiCp alone: the matrix alloy also contributes to the threshold stress. The higher threshold stress of the composite compared with that of the matrix alloy can be explained in terms of load transfer in the composite and the value of threshold stress for the matrix alloy. A direct comparison between the composite and its matrix alloy indicates that only below a critical stress does the composite show a creep resistance higher than that of its matrix alloy. The two materials shown cyclic creep retardation in the tested stress range, cyclic creep showing a higher stress exponent and higher apparent activation energies in comparison with static creep. An analysis based on anelasticity is introduced to explain this result. The relationships between rupture lifetimes and applied stress, creep rate, and unloading amount show that the creep fracture mechanism is dominant in the present test condition. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Materials Science and Technology SAGE

Static and cyclic creep behaviour of 2024/SiCp and its matrix alloy at high temperature

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/static-and-cyclic-creep-behaviour-of-2024-sicp-and-its-matrix-alloy-at-NX9RoA56rP

References (21)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 1997 Maney Publishing
ISSN
0267-0836
eISSN
1743-2847
DOI
10.1179/mst.1997.13.8.667
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The tensile creep and tensile-tensile cyclic creep behaviour of 2024/SiCp composite and its matrix alloy have been investigated and analysed at high temperature. It was found that the creep threshold stress of the composite may not be caused by SiCp alone: the matrix alloy also contributes to the threshold stress. The higher threshold stress of the composite compared with that of the matrix alloy can be explained in terms of load transfer in the composite and the value of threshold stress for the matrix alloy. A direct comparison between the composite and its matrix alloy indicates that only below a critical stress does the composite show a creep resistance higher than that of its matrix alloy. The two materials shown cyclic creep retardation in the tested stress range, cyclic creep showing a higher stress exponent and higher apparent activation energies in comparison with static creep. An analysis based on anelasticity is introduced to explain this result. The relationships between rupture lifetimes and applied stress, creep rate, and unloading amount show that the creep fracture mechanism is dominant in the present test condition.

Journal

Materials Science and TechnologySAGE

Published: Aug 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.