Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Garcia, R. O’neil (2000)
Effect of Coleus Size and Variegation on Attack Rates, Searching Strategy, and Selected Life History Characteristics of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)Biological Control, 18
J. Lenné, P. Trutmann, C. Tropical (1994)
Diseases of tropical pasture plants
R. Wang, S. Ghabrial (2002)
Effect of Aphid Behavior on Efficiency of Transmission of Soybean mosaic virus by the Soybean-Colonizing Aphid, Aphis glycines.Plant disease, 86 11
K. Chen, K. Hopper (1997)
Diuraphis noxia (Homoptera: Aphididae) Population Dynamics and Impact of Natural Enemies in the Montpellier Region of Southern FranceEnvironmental Entomology, 26
C. Rutledge, R. O’neil, T. Fox, D. Landis (2004)
Soybean Aphid Predators and Their Use in Integrated Pest Management, 97
T. Grasswitz, E. Burts (1995)
Effect of native natural enemies and augmentative releases of Chrysoperla rufilabris Burmeister and Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani) on the population dynamics of the green apple aphid, Aphis pomi De GeerInternational Journal of Pest Management, 41
T. Macedo, C. Bastos, Leon Higley, K. Ostlie, S. Madhavan (2003)
Photosynthetic responses of soybean to soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) injury.Journal of economic entomology, 96 1
K. Hirano, K. Honda, S. Miyai (1996)
Effects of Temperature on Development, Longevity and Reproduction of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines (Homoptera: Aphididae)Applied Entomology and Zoology, 31
C. Rutledge, R. O’neil, T. Fox, D. Landis (2004)
Soybean aphid predators and their use in IPM, 97
W. Symondson, K. Sunderland, M. Greenstone (2003)
Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?Annual review of entomology, 47
H. Berg, D. Ankasah, A. Muhammad, R. Rusli, H. Widayanto, H. Wirasto, I. Yully (1997)
Evaluating the role of predation in population fluctuations of the soybean aphid Aphis glycines in farmers' fields in IndonesiaJournal of Applied Ecology, 34
P. Starý (1995)
Natural enemy spectrum ofAphis spiraephaga (Hom.: Aphididae), an exotic immigrant aphid in Central EuropeEntomophaga, 40
Xincai Han (1997)
Population dynamics of soybean aphid Aphis glycines and its natural enemies in fieldsHubei Agricultural Sciences, 2
D. Simberloff, B. Holle (1999)
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?Biological Invasions, 1
R. Luck, B. Shepard, P. Kenmore (1999)
Evaluation of Biological Control with Experimental Methods
G. Chang, P. Kareiva (1999)
Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control: The case for indigenous generalists in biological control
A. Clark, K. Perry (2002)
Transmissibility of Field Isolates of Soybean Viruses by Aphis glycines.Plant disease, 86 11
T. Fox, D. Landis (2003)
IMPACT OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT ON GENERALIST PREDATORS OF THE SOYBEAN APHID , APHIS GLYCINES MATSUMURA
W. Li, Z. Pu (1991)
Population dynamics of aphids and epidemics of soybean mosaic virus in summer sown soybean fields., 18
J. Obrycki, T. Kring (1998)
Predaceous Coccinellidae in biological control.Annual review of entomology, 43
Wang Suyun, Bao Xiangzhi, Sun Ya-jie, Chen Rui-lu, Zhai Bao-ping (1996)
Study on the effects of the population dynamics of soyabean aphid (Aphis glycines) on both growth and yield of soyabean.Soybean Science, 15
The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, is an invasive pest of soybean, first discovered in North America in 2000. We studied the ability of the existing predator community in soybean to suppress A. glycines population growth during June–August 2002, in field studies using predator exclusion and sham cages or no-cage controls. Cages were infested with uniform initial densities of A. glycines adults, and subsequent populations of aphids and predators were monitored. After 2 wk, exclusion and sham cages were switched, with aphid and predator density followed for additional 2 wk. The experiment was repeated a second time, allowing observation of predator community response to both low and high density aphid populations over several time periods and stages of soybean development. Cages had minimal effects on temperature, relative humidity, or soybean growth. In contrast, predator communities and aphid populations were strongly affected by cage treatments. In the first trial, the activity of foliar-foraging predators effectively prevented A. glycines population growth maintaining populations below 10 aphids per plant (adult + nymphs) in sham cages, while populations exceeded 200 aphids per plant in exclusion cages. After cage switch, these high A. glycines populations in the former exclusion cages were rapidly colonized and reduced by nearly an order of magnitude within 2 wk by a combination of generalist and specialist predators. The second trial produced qualitatively similar results, but at much lower aphid densities. The most abundant predators in both trials included: Harmonia axyridis Pallas, Orius insidiosus (Say), and Leucopis spp. These studies demonstrate that existing predator communities comprised of a mixture of indigenous and naturalized species can suppress A. glycines population density in soybean. The impact of existing predator communities should be further investigated as a component of A. glycines management in United States soybean production systems.
Environmental Entomology – Oxford University Press
Published: Jun 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.