Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Lardinois, W. Weder, T. Hany, E. Kamel, S. Korom, B. Seifert, G. Schulthess, H. Steinert (2003)
Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography.The New England journal of medicine, 348 25
H. Steinert, Markus Hauser, F. Allemann, H. Engel, T. Berthold, G. Schulthess, W. Weder (1997)
Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling.Radiology, 202 2
W. Weber, V. Petersen, B. Schmidt, Leishia Tyndale-Hines, T. Link, C. Peschel, M. Schwaiger (2003)
Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 21 14
M. Seltzer, C. Yap, D. Silverman, Joubin Meta, C. Schiepers, M. Phelps, S. Gambhir, Jyotsna Rao, P. Valk, J. Czernin (2002)
The impact of PET on the management of lung cancer: the referring physician's perspective.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 43 6
R. Mckenna, H. Libshitz, Clifton Mountain, M. McMurtrey (1985)
Roentgenographic evaluation of mediastinal nodes for preoperative assessment in lung cancer.Chest, 88 2
B. Dwamena, S. Sonnad, J. Angobaldo, R. Wahl (1999)
Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: mediastinal staging in the 1990s--meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT.Radiology, 213 2
M. Phelps, E. Hoffman, N. Mullani, M. Ter-pogossian (1975)
Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 16 3
T. Arita, T. Kuramitsu, M. Kawamura, T. Matsumoto, N. Matsunaga, K. Sugi, Kensuke Esato, T. Kuramitsu, M. Kawamura, T. Matsumoto, N. Matsunaga (1995)
Bronchogenic carcinoma: incidence of metastases to normal sized lymph nodes.Thorax, 50
Walter Scott, J. Shepherd, S. Gambhir (1998)
Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis.The Annals of thoracic surgery, 66 6
S. Eschmann, G. Reischl, K. Bilger, Juergen Kupferschläger, M. Thelen, B. Dohmen, Hariolf Besenfelder, R. Bares (2002)
Evaluation of dosimetry of radioiodine therapy in benign and malignant thyroid disorders by means of iodine-124 and PETEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 29
E. Patz, V. Lowe, J. Hoffman, S. Paine, P. Burrowes, R. Coleman, P. Goodman (1993)
Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning.Radiology, 188 2
K. Higashi, Y. Ueda, H. Seki, Kokichi Yuasa, M. Oguchi, Tetsuhiko Noguchi, M. Taniguchi, H. Tonami, T. Okimura, I. Yamamoto (1998)
Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 39 6
T. Arita, T. Matsumoto, T. Kuramitsu, M. Kawamura, N. Matsunaga, K. Sugi, K. Esato (1996)
Is it possible to differentiate malignant mediastinal nodes from benign nodes by size? Reevaluation by CT, transesophageal echocardiography, and nodal specimen.Chest, 110 4
K. Mah, C. Caldwell, C. Caldwell, Y. Ung, C. Danjoux, J. Balogh, S. Ganguli, S. Ganguli, L. Ehrlich, L. Ehrlich, R. Tirona (2002)
The impact of (18)FDG-PET on target and critical organs in CT-based treatment planning of patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 52 2
V. Kalff, R. Hicks, M. MacManus, D. Binns, A. McKenzie, R. Ware, A. Hogg, D. Ball (2001)
Clinical impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 19 1
C. Good, T. Wilson (1958)
The solitary circumscribed pulmonary nodule; study of seven hundred five cases encountered roentgenologically in a period of three and one-half years.Journal of the American Medical Association, 166 3
N. Choi, A. Fischman, A. Niemierko, J. Ryu, T. Lynch, J. Wain, C. Wright, P. Fidias, D. Mathisen (2002)
Dose-response relationship between probability of pathologic tumor control and glucose metabolic rate measured with FDG PET after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 54 4
M. Gould, Courtney Maclean, W. Kuschner, C. Rydzak, D. Owens (2001)
Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis.JAMA, 285 7
T. Bury, A. Dowlati, P. Paulus, J. Corhay, R. Hustinx, B. Ghaye, M. Radermecker, P. Rigo (1997)
Whole-body 18FDG positron emission tomography in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer.The European respiratory journal, 10 11
Lillington Ga, C. Ci (1993)
Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodulesClinics in Chest Medicine, 14
N. Gupta, W. Tamim, G. Graeber, H. Bishop, G. Hobbs (2001)
Mediastinal lymph node sampling following positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in lung cancer staging.Chest, 120 2
H. Vesselle, Jeffrey Pugsley, E. Vallières, D. Wood (2002)
The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography on the surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 124 3
S. Eschmann, G. Friedel, F. Paulsen, W. Budach, C. Harer-Mouline, B. Dohmen, R. Bares (2002)
FDG PET for staging of advanced non-small cell lung cancer prior to neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 29
J. Vansteenkiste, S. Stroobants, P. Leyn, P. Dupont, J. Bogaert, A. Maes, G. Deneffe, K. Nackaerts, J. Verschakelen, T. Lerut, L. Mortelmans, M. Demedts (1998)
Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 16 6
N. Dewan, N. Gupta, L. Redepenning, J. Phalen, M. Frick (1993)
Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Potential role in evaluation and management.Chest, 104 4
Michael Farrell, H. McAdams, James Herndon, E. Patz (2000)
Non-small cell lung cancer: FDG PET for nodal staging in patients with stage I disease.Radiology, 215 3
V. Lowe, J. Hoffman, D. DeLong, E. Patz, R. Coleman (1994)
Semiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 35 11
P. Verboom, H. Tinteren, O. Hoekstra, E. Smit, J. Bergh, A. Schreurs, R. Stallaert, P. Velthoven, E. Comans, Fred Diepenhorst, J. Mourik, P. Postmus, M. Boers, E. Grijseels, G. Teule, C. Groot, the group (2003)
Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS studyEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 30
M. Manus, R. Hicks, J. Matthews, A. McKenzie, D. Rischin, E. Salminen, D. Ball (2003)
Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 21 7
K. Langen, U. Braun, E. Kops, H. Herzog, Torsten Kuwert, B. Nebeling, L. Feinendegen (1993)
The influence of plasma glucose levels on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in bronchial carcinomas.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 34 3
C. Hoekstra, S. Stroobants, O. Hoekstra, J. Vansteenkiste, B. Biesma, F. Schramel, N. Zandwijk, H. Tinteren, E. Smit (2003)
The value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the selection of patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer for combined modality treatment.Lung cancer, 39 2
N. Dewan, C. Shehan, S. Reeb, L. Gobar, Walter Scott, K. Ryschon (1997)
Likelihood of malignancy in a solitary pulmonary nodule: comparison of Bayesian analysis and results of FDG-PET scan.Chest, 112 2
R. Cerfolio, Buddhiwardhan Ojha, A. Bryant, C. Bass, A. Bartalucci, J. Mountz (2003)
The role of FDG-PET scan in staging patients with nonsmall cell carcinoma.The Annals of thoracic surgery, 76 3
D. Delbeke, S. Videlefsky, J. Patton, M. Campbell, W. Martin, I. Ohana, M. Sandler (1995)
Rest myocardial perfusion/metabolism imaging using simultaneous dual-isotope acquisition SPECT with technetium-99m-MIBI/fluorine-18-FDG.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 36 11
S. Kosuda, K. Ichihara, M. Watanabe, H. Kobayashi, S. Kusano (2000)
Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of chest 2-fluoro-2-D-[(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with pulmonary nodules (non-small cell lung carcinoma) in Japan.Chest, 117 2
P. Shreve, R. Steventon, E. Deters, P. Kison, M. Gross, R. Wahl (1998)
Oncologic diagnosis with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose imaging: dual-head coincidence gamma camera versus positron emission tomographic scanner.Radiology, 207 2
N. Gupta, A. Frank, N. Dewan, L. Redepenning, M. Rothberg, J. Mailliard, J. Phalen, J. Sunderland, M. Frick (1992)
Solitary pulmonary nodules: detection of malignancy with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.Radiology, 184 2
R. Workman, R. Coleman (1999)
PET in lung cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 40 5
T. Hsia, Y. Shen, R. Yen, C. Kao, S. Changlai (2002)
Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diophosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Neoplasma, 49 4
J. Erasmus, H. McAdams, E. Patz, R. Coleman, V. Ahuja, P. Goodman (1998)
Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors using FDG PET.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 170 5
The dissemination of positron emission tomography (PET) technology has enabled a functional approach to the evaluation of lung cancer that complements the anatomic assessment provided by chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging. PET has excellent sensitivity and good specificity for the determination of malignancy in the solitary pulmonary nodule, but these data must be weighed against the evidence of instances of false-positive results because of inflammatory lesions and false-negative results in small-or low-metabolism neoplasms. Therefore, PET may not be advisable when these scenarios apply. Furthermore, in a patient with a very high pretest likelihood of lung cancer (eg, a new or enlarging spiculated nodule in a long-time smoker), the value of PET is less certain because a negative result may be discounted. PET has altered the approach to the staging of lung cancer. It adds value to the evaluation of the mediastinum and extrathoracic structures compared to conventional methods by upstaging or downstaging a substantial proportion of patients. If the staging assessment is negative on PET, the use of mediastinoscopy may be obviated in selected cases. Histologic confirmation of positive PET findings should be obtained before excluding patients from curative resection. PET provides incremental information to CT in the evaluation of persistent and recurrent disease, and response measured on PET appears more accurate as a predictor of ultimate survival. The more recent development of PET-CT permits fusion of anatomic and functional information. Early investigations suggest that this strategy provides superior results compared to either technique alone.
Current Treatment Options in Oncology – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 11, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.