Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged— What We Have Learned from Field Research

Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged— What We Have Learned from Field Research <jats:p>In late 1967, Project Follow Through was reorganized to select, test, and evaluate promising but different educational programs for disadvantaged youngsters in the first three grades. Now, nearly ten years later, the completed evaluations of Follow Through suggest that one of these programs, the University of Oregon's Direct Instruction Model, has produced significant gains in measures of positive affect, basic skills, and conceptual reasoning. In this article, Wesley Becker discusses the distinctive features of this model—its underlying assumptions and basic teaching components. He then explores the implications of teaching reading and language skills to economically disadvantaged children and advocates that immediate steps be taken to teach vocabulary systematically throughout the school years. Viewing this goal as essential for compensatory education, he concludes with an analysis of how vocabulary instruction might best be implemented.</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Harvard Educational Review CrossRef

Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged— What We Have Learned from Field Research

Harvard Educational Review , Volume 47 (4): 518-543 – Dec 1, 1977

Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged— What We Have Learned from Field Research


Abstract

<jats:p>In late 1967, Project Follow Through was reorganized to select, test, and evaluate promising but different educational programs for disadvantaged youngsters in the first three grades. Now, nearly ten years later, the completed evaluations of Follow Through suggest that one of these programs, the University of Oregon's Direct Instruction Model, has produced significant gains in measures of positive affect, basic skills, and conceptual reasoning. In this article, Wesley Becker discusses the distinctive features of this model—its underlying assumptions and basic teaching components. He then explores the implications of teaching reading and language skills to economically disadvantaged children and advocates that immediate steps be taken to teach vocabulary systematically throughout the school years. Viewing this goal as essential for compensatory education, he concludes with an analysis of how vocabulary instruction might best be implemented.</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/teaching-reading-and-language-to-the-disadvantaged-what-we-have-L1mc0GZrgJ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0017-8055
DOI
10.17763/haer.47.4.51431w6022u51015
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p>In late 1967, Project Follow Through was reorganized to select, test, and evaluate promising but different educational programs for disadvantaged youngsters in the first three grades. Now, nearly ten years later, the completed evaluations of Follow Through suggest that one of these programs, the University of Oregon's Direct Instruction Model, has produced significant gains in measures of positive affect, basic skills, and conceptual reasoning. In this article, Wesley Becker discusses the distinctive features of this model—its underlying assumptions and basic teaching components. He then explores the implications of teaching reading and language skills to economically disadvantaged children and advocates that immediate steps be taken to teach vocabulary systematically throughout the school years. Viewing this goal as essential for compensatory education, he concludes with an analysis of how vocabulary instruction might best be implemented.</jats:p>

Journal

Harvard Educational ReviewCrossRef

Published: Dec 1, 1977

There are no references for this article.