Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Gordon, R. Bender, G. Herman (1970)
Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography.Journal of theoretical biology, 29 3
R. Rosenberg, W. Hunt, M. Williamson, Frank Gilliland, P. Wiest, C. Kelsey, C. Key, M. Linver (1998)
Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.Radiology, 209 2
J. Simonoff (1998)
Smoothing Methods in Statistics
Y. Vardi, L. Shepp, L. Kaufman (1985)
A Statistical Model for Positron Emission TomographyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 80
G. Givens, J. Hoeting (2013)
Nonparametric Density Estimation
M. Rosenblatt (1956)
Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density FunctionAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 27
D. Rosier, A. Klug (1968)
Reconstruction of Three Dimensional Structures from Electron MicrographsNature, 217
D. Scott (1979)
On optimal and data based histogramsBiometrika, 66
Adonis Yatchew (2003)
Semiparametric Regression for the Applied Econometrician: References
L. Devroye, G. Lugosi (2001)
Combinatorial methods in density estimation
(1992)
On Lifting the Inherent Limitations of Positron Emission Tomography by Using Magnetic Fields (MagPET)
S. Sheather, M. Jones (1991)
A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimationJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 53
M. Samiuddin, M. Jones, G. El‐Sayyad (1993)
On bin–based density estimationJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 47
E. Parzen (1962)
On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and ModeAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 33
A. Raheja, A. Dhawan (2000)
Wavelet based multiresolution expectation maximization image reconstruction algorithm for positron emission tomography.Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 24
R. Huesman, G. Klein, William Moses, Jinyi Qi, Bryan Reutter, P. Virador (2000)
List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular samplingIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 19
(1975)
Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., pp.C4-1 to C4-4
L. Devroye, L. Györfi (1987)
Nonparametric density estimation : the L[1] viewJournal of the American Statistical Association, 82
L. Kaufman (1987)
Implementing and Accelerating the EM Algorithm for Positron Emission TomographyIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 6
Walter Smith (1959)
Probability and StatisticsNature, 186
PET (positron emission tomography) scans are still in the experimental phase, as one of the newest breast cancer diagnostic techniques. There are two traditional approaches to the computation of images from data collected in PET. In the first, standard CT (computed tomography) algorithms are used on rays designated by pairs of detectors receiving coincidence events. The problem generated by this approach is that generally only the mean can be used by such algorithms. With the relatively small numbers of events in PET, and with Poisson statistics for which variance equals the mean, the noise sensivity of standard CT algorithms becomes limiting. This is exasperated further by 3D imaging with cylindrical arrays of detectors. Statistical CT algorithms take the variance into account. As in the list-mode approach, we consider each coincidence event individually. However, we estimate the location of the annihilation event that caused each coincidence event, one by one, based on the previously assigned location of events processed earlier. The estimated annihilation locations form the image. To accomplish this, we construct a probability distribution along each coincidence line. This is generated from previous annihilation points by density estimation. In this paper we present our density estimation approach to positron emission tomography. Nonparametric methods of density estimation are overviewed followed by numerical examples. Our goal here is to determine which density estimation approach is most suitable for PET.
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment – SAGE
Published: Jun 24, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.