Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1990)
In all our qftclirs: Making crises work for you
J. Cunningham, L. Sobell, M. Sobell, Geeta Kapur (1995)
Resolution from alcohol problems with and without treatment: reasons for change.Journal of substance abuse, 7 3
(1992)
12-step.f(lcilitation therapist manual: A clinical research guide .!fir therapists treating individua
E. Brückner, M. Krausz (2002)
A Community Reinforcement Approach to Addiction TreatmentInternational Journal of Drug Policy, 13
V. Hasselt, M. Hersen (1996)
Sourcebook of Psychological Treatment Manuals for Adult Disorders
M. Liepman, T. Nirenberg, Ann Begin (1989)
Evaluation of a program designed to help family and significant others to motivate resistant alcoholics into recovery.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 15 2
(1996)
StrucTUred Clinical IntervieH' .f(ir DSM-IV. Patient edition (SCID-I/A Version
H. Liddle (1982)
The family therapy of drug abuse and addiction
N. Azrin (1976)
Improvements in the community-reinforcement approach to alcoholism.Behaviour research and therapy, 14 5
(1986)
Intervention: HOII' to help those )l'ho don't want help
R. Velleman, Gerald Bennett, Tony Miller, J. Orford, Kate Rigby, Anne Tod (1993)
The families of problem drug users: a study of 50 close relatives.Addiction, 88 9
B. Loneck, James Garrett, Steven Banks (1996)
A comparison of the Johnson Intervention with four other methods of referral to outpatient treatment.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 22 2
R. Meyers (1998)
Community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT): engaging unmotivated drug users in treatment.Journal of substance abuse, 10 3
G. Hunt, N. Azrin (1973)
A community-reinforcement approach to alcoholism.Behaviour research and therapy, 11 1
E. Gordis (1995)
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismAlcohol Health and Research World, 19
(200)
Received February Revision received November IS
K. Kirby, D. Marlowe, D. Festinger, Kerry Garvey, Vincent LaMonaca (1999)
Community reinforcement training for family and significant others of drug abusers: a unilateral intervention to increase treatment entry of drug users.Drug and alcohol dependence, 56 1
M. Hertzman (1991)
Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems: a report which deserves to be debated. "Our vision": Chapter 1 of the Institute of Medicine Report.British journal of addiction, 86 7
N. Azrin, R. Sisson, R. Meyers, M. Godley (1982)
Alcoholism treatment by disulfiram and community reinforcement therapy.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 13 2
W. Miller, R. Meyers, J. Tonigan (1999)
Engaging the unmotivated in treatment for alcohol problems: a comparison of three strategies for intervention through family members.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 67 5
R. Meyers, W. Miller (2001)
A community reinforcement approach to addiction treatment.
Robert Sisson, N. Azrin (1986)
Family-member involvement to initiate and promote treatment of problem drinkers.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 17 1
Dc Washington (1994)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed.
J. Smith, R. Meyers, W. Miller (2001)
The community reinforcement approach to the treatment of substance use disorders.The American journal on addictions, 10 s1
E. Gomberg (1992)
Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol ProblemsJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180
J. Smith, R. Meyers, H. Delaney (1998)
The community reinforcement approach with homeless alcohol-dependent individuals.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66 3
R. Meyers, T. Dominguez, J. Smith (1996)
Community Reinforcement Training with Concerned Others
Earl Kiphart, Ken Lawler, John Meskenas (2002)
A COMMUNITY-REINFORCEMENT APPROACH TO ALCOHOLISM*
In a randomized clinical trial, 90 concerned significant others (CSOs) of treatment-refusing illicit drug users were assigned to either (a) community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT), which teaches behavior change skills; (b) CRAFT with additional group aftercare sessions after the completion of the individual sessions; or (c) Al-Anon and Nar-Anon facilitation therapy (Al-Nar FT). All protocols received 12 hr of manual-guided individual treatment. Follow-up rates for the CSOs were consistently at least 96%. The CRAFT conditions were significantly more effective than Al-Nar FT in engaging initially unmotivated drug users into treatment. CRAFT alone engaged 58.6%, CRAFT + aftercare engaged 76.7%, and Al-Nar FT engaged 29.0%. No CSO engaged a treatment-refusing loved one once individual sessions had been completed.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Oct 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.