Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

VEP in neglect patients have longer latencies for luminance but not for chromatic patterns.

VEP in neglect patients have longer latencies for luminance but not for chromatic patterns. In patients with unilateral neglect, visual evoked potentials (VEP) to stimuli displayed in the left visual field are delayed compared with responses to right visual field stimuli. In the present study, 10 patients with right brain damage and neglect were tested with contrast-reversed sinusoidal gratings, modulated either in luminance or in chromaticity. For gratings of luminance contrast modulated over relatively high temporal frequencies (4-10.5 Hz), latencies of VEP were about 30 ms longer for stimuli presented to the contralesional (left) visual field than to the field ipsilateral to the lesion. For equiluminant stimuli modulated at relatively low temporal frequencies (1-4 Hz), however, latency was the same for both hemifields. As this condition activates predominately the parvocellular pathway the results are consistent with our previous suggestion that the delay observed with luminance stimuli in neglect patients results from selective disruption of the faster response of the magnocellular pathway. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neuroreport Pubmed

VEP in neglect patients have longer latencies for luminance but not for chromatic patterns.

Neuroreport , Volume 7 (3): -805 – Nov 5, 1996

VEP in neglect patients have longer latencies for luminance but not for chromatic patterns.


Abstract

In patients with unilateral neglect, visual evoked potentials (VEP) to stimuli displayed in the left visual field are delayed compared with responses to right visual field stimuli. In the present study, 10 patients with right brain damage and neglect were tested with contrast-reversed sinusoidal gratings, modulated either in luminance or in chromaticity. For gratings of luminance contrast modulated over relatively high temporal frequencies (4-10.5 Hz), latencies of VEP were about 30 ms longer for stimuli presented to the contralesional (left) visual field than to the field ipsilateral to the lesion. For equiluminant stimuli modulated at relatively low temporal frequencies (1-4 Hz), however, latency was the same for both hemifields. As this condition activates predominately the parvocellular pathway the results are consistent with our previous suggestion that the delay observed with luminance stimuli in neglect patients results from selective disruption of the faster response of the magnocellular pathway.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/vep-in-neglect-patients-have-longer-latencies-for-luminance-but-not-K2Fy8Ud1DB

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0959-4965
DOI
10.1097/00001756-199602290-00032
pmid
8733752

Abstract

In patients with unilateral neglect, visual evoked potentials (VEP) to stimuli displayed in the left visual field are delayed compared with responses to right visual field stimuli. In the present study, 10 patients with right brain damage and neglect were tested with contrast-reversed sinusoidal gratings, modulated either in luminance or in chromaticity. For gratings of luminance contrast modulated over relatively high temporal frequencies (4-10.5 Hz), latencies of VEP were about 30 ms longer for stimuli presented to the contralesional (left) visual field than to the field ipsilateral to the lesion. For equiluminant stimuli modulated at relatively low temporal frequencies (1-4 Hz), however, latency was the same for both hemifields. As this condition activates predominately the parvocellular pathway the results are consistent with our previous suggestion that the delay observed with luminance stimuli in neglect patients results from selective disruption of the faster response of the magnocellular pathway.

Journal

NeuroreportPubmed

Published: Nov 5, 1996

There are no references for this article.