Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reconstruction: The Bringing of Peace and Plenty or Occult Imperialism?

Reconstruction: The Bringing of Peace and Plenty or Occult Imperialism? Reconstruction and imperialism are often portrayed either as opposites or necessary collaborators in status quo states' repression of the lesser mortals of our international system. This article examines these debates in the light of what is happening in Iraq and Afghanistan and argues that the two concepts should rather be seen as inevitable if uneasy bedfellows in a world where simple denunciations or weary acceptations of “reality” are simply not good enough. It looks at some recent writing on reconstruction, from critical and not so critical perspectives as well as examining how the recent concept of reconstruction has a clear historical genealogy which does much to explain both its positive and negative aspects. Its further suggests that we need to develop better policy and theoretical thinking to encompass the new needs of our reconstruction epoch. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Global Society Taylor & Francis

Reconstruction: The Bringing of Peace and Plenty or Occult Imperialism?

Global Society , Volume 21 (4): 13 – Oct 1, 2007
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/reconstruction-the-bringing-of-peace-and-plenty-or-occult-imperialism-Jr200631x0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright University of Kent
ISSN
1469-798X
eISSN
1360-0826
DOI
10.1080/13600820701562769
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reconstruction and imperialism are often portrayed either as opposites or necessary collaborators in status quo states' repression of the lesser mortals of our international system. This article examines these debates in the light of what is happening in Iraq and Afghanistan and argues that the two concepts should rather be seen as inevitable if uneasy bedfellows in a world where simple denunciations or weary acceptations of “reality” are simply not good enough. It looks at some recent writing on reconstruction, from critical and not so critical perspectives as well as examining how the recent concept of reconstruction has a clear historical genealogy which does much to explain both its positive and negative aspects. Its further suggests that we need to develop better policy and theoretical thinking to encompass the new needs of our reconstruction epoch.

Journal

Global SocietyTaylor & Francis

Published: Oct 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.