Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Robinson, W. Grant, B. Loveys (1988)
Stomatal Limitation of Photosynthesis in Abscisic Acid-Treated and in Water-Stressed Leaves Measured at Elevated CO2Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 15
I. Terashima, S. Wong, C. Osmond, G. Farquhar (1988)
Characterisation of Non-Uniform Photosynthesis Induced by Abscisic Acid in Leaves Having Different Mesophyll AnatomiesPlant and Cell Physiology, 29
T. Hinckley, R. Teskey (1981)
CHAPTER 3 – TEMPERATE HARDWOOD FORESTS
(1977)
Photosynthetic acclimation to temperature and water stress in the desert shrub NI AND PALLARDY Larrea divaricata
H. Jones (1985)
Partitioning stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations to photosynthesisPlant Cell and Environment, 8
T. Hinckley, P. Dougherty, J. Lassoie, J. Roberts, R. Teskey (1979)
A severe drought: impact on tree growth, phenology, net photosynthetic rate and water relations.American Midland Naturalist, 102
(1991)
Response of gas exchange to water stress in woody angiosperm seedlings: net photosynthesis, leaf conductance, and water use efficiency
J. Cheeseman (1991)
PATCHY: simulating and visualizing the effects of stomatal patchiness on photosynthetic CO2 exchange studiesPlant Cell and Environment, 14
R. Hutmacher, D. Krieg (1983)
Photosynthetic rate control in cotton : stomatal and nonstomatal factors.Plant physiology, 73 3
W. Downton, B. Loveys, W. Grant (1988)
Stomatal closure fully accounts for the inhibition of photosynthesis by abscisic acid.The New phytologist, 108 3
U. Martin, S. Pallardy, Z. Bahari (1987)
Dehydration tolerance of leaf tissues of six woody angiosperm speciesPhysiologia Plantarum, 69
Z. Bahari, S. Pallardy, W. Parker (1985)
Photosynthesis, water relations, and drought adaptation in six woody species of oak-hickory forests in central Missouri.Forest Science, 31
(1957)
parative chlorine requirements of different plant species
Thomas Sharkey, J. Seemann (1989)
Mild water stress effects on carbon-reduction-cycle intermediates, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and spatial homogeneity of photosynthesis in intact leaves.Plant physiology, 89 4
Sidney Perry, Daniel Krieg, R. Hutmacher (1983)
Photosynthetic rate control in cotton : photorespiration.Plant physiology, 73 3
(1977)
Photosynthetic acclimation to temperature and water stress in the desert shrub
G. Farquhar, T. Sharkey (1982)
Stomatal conductance and photosynthesisAnnual Review of Plant Biology, 33
G. Cornic, I. Papgeorgiou, G. Louason (1987)
Effect of a Rapid and a Slow Drought Cycle followed by Rehydration on Stomatal and Non-stomatal Components of Leaf Photosynthesis in Phaseolus vulgaris L.Journal of Plant Physiology, 126
Deborah Ginter-Whitehouse, T. Hinckley, S. Pallardy (1983)
Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Water Relations of Three Tree Species with Different Vascular AnatomyForest Science, 29
K. Winter, M. Schramm (1986)
Analysis of Stomatal and Nonstomatal Components in the Environmental Control of CO(2) Exchange in Leaves of Welwitschia mirabilis.Plant physiology, 82 1
N. Terry (1980)
Limiting Factors in Photosynthesis: I. USE OF IRON STRESS TO CONTROL PHOTOCHEMICAL CAPACITY IN VIVO.Plant physiology, 65 1
M. Matthews, J. Boyer (1984)
Acclimation of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials.Plant physiology, 74 1
R. Teskey, J. Fites, L. Samuelson, B. Bongarten (1986)
Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. under different environmental conditions.Tree physiology, 2 1_2_3
G. Briggs, T. Jurik, D. Gates (1986)
Non‐stomatal limitation of CO2 assimilation in three tree species during natural drought conditionsPhysiologia Plantarum, 66
Abstract Comparative responses of net photosynthesis (A) to water stress in woody species from a variety of habitats were studied to assess the relationship between photosynthetic attributes and drought tolerance. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to A were compared in three-month-old white oak (Quercus alba L.), post oak (Quercus stellata Wangenh.), sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.), and black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) seedlings during a drying cycle. Relative stomatal limitation of photosynthesis (I) was less than 50% in all species except for Q. stellata seedlings subjected to severe water stress. No significant changes in I were observed in Q. alba and J. nigra before, during, and after drought. In A. saccharum, I was generally low and decreased significantly under water stress. Under well-watered conditions, A was highest in Q. stellata, intermediate in Q. alba, and lower in A. saccharum and J. nigra. High A in well-watered Q. stellata was associated with high stomatal conductance and carboxylation efficiency, whereas low A was associated with low stomatal conductance and carboxylation efficiency in A. saccharum and low stomatal conductance, low carboxylation efficiency, and high CO2 compensation point in J. nigra. Under severe water stress, A, carboxylation efficiency, and stomatal conductance decreased substantially in all species; however, Q. stellata had the highest carboxylation efficiency and lowest CO2 compensation point under these conditions. After 5 days at high soil moisture after drought, stomatal and mesophyll components of A in A. saccharum and J. nigra had not recovered to predrought levels, whereas they had completely recovered in Q. stellata and Q. alba. The photosynthetic apparatus, especially mesophyll components, of drought-tolerant Quercus species showed either less inhibition under water stress, superior recovery to predrought capacity, or both. Exposure of the leaves to 14CO2 indicated apparent asymmetric stomatal closure for mildly water-stressed seedlings, but not for leaves of well-watered, severely stressed, or rehydrated plants. These results suggest that patchy stomatal closure under mild water stress might be important for water stress-induced inhibition of photosynthesis, but not under the more severe water stress imposed in this study. 2 Present address: Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. 1 Research funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Biology Competitive Grants Program. Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series 11,342. This content is only available as a PDF. © 1992 American Society of Plant Biologists This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
Plant Physiology – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.