Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment: Strength of Regulatory Focus as Moderator

Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment: Strength of Regulatory Focus as Moderator Goals with a promotion focus versus a prevention focus are distinguished. Chronic ideal goals(hopes and aspirations) have a promotion focus, whereas ought goals(duties and responsibilities) have a prevention focus. The hypothesis that emotional responses to goal attainment vary as a function of promotion versus prevention goal strength (conceptualized as goal accessibility) was tested in correlational studies relating chronic goal attainment (self-congruencies or self-discrepancies) to emotional frequency and intensity (Studies 1–3) and in an experimental study relating immediate goal attainment (i.e., success or failure) to emotional intensity (Study 4). All studies found that goal attainment yielded greater cheerfulness–dejection responses when promotion focus was stronger and greater quiescence–agitation responses when prevention focus was stronger. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Personality and Social Psychology American Psychological Association

Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment: Strength of Regulatory Focus as Moderator

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/emotional-responses-to-goal-attainment-strength-of-regulatory-focus-as-JGPKZUGzKd

References (37)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0022-3514
eISSN
1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Goals with a promotion focus versus a prevention focus are distinguished. Chronic ideal goals(hopes and aspirations) have a promotion focus, whereas ought goals(duties and responsibilities) have a prevention focus. The hypothesis that emotional responses to goal attainment vary as a function of promotion versus prevention goal strength (conceptualized as goal accessibility) was tested in correlational studies relating chronic goal attainment (self-congruencies or self-discrepancies) to emotional frequency and intensity (Studies 1–3) and in an experimental study relating immediate goal attainment (i.e., success or failure) to emotional intensity (Study 4). All studies found that goal attainment yielded greater cheerfulness–dejection responses when promotion focus was stronger and greater quiescence–agitation responses when prevention focus was stronger.

Journal

Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Mar 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.