Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Fleming (2005)
Workers’ Playtime?The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41
C. Robert, Wan Yan (2007)
The Case for Developing New Research on Humor and Culture in Organizations: Toward a Higher Grade of Manure, 26
R. Liden, Raymond Sparrowe, Sandy Wayne (1997)
Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future.
A. Page, R. Jones (1989)
Business Growth – How to Achieve and Sustain ItLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 10
T. Snijders, R. Bosker (1999)
Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling
J. Mathieu, Herman Aguinis, S. Culpepper, Gilad Chen (2012)
Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling.The Journal of applied psychology, 97 5
David Lahuis, Matthew Ferguson (2009)
The Accuracy of Significance Tests for Slope Variance Components in Multilevel Random Coefficient ModelsOrganizational Research Methods, 12
Wayne Decker (1987)
Managerial Humor and Subordinate Satisfaction.Social Behavior and Personality, 15
Cecily Cooper (2005)
Just Joking Around? Employee Humor Expression As An Ingratiatory BehaviorAcademy of Management Review, 30
P. Podsakoff, D. Organ (1986)
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and ProspectsJournal of Management, 12
Alexander Pundt, F. Herrmann (2015)
Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader–member exchangeJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88
Eric Romero, Kevin Cruthirds (2006)
The use of humor in the workplaceIEEE Engineering Management Review, 34
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
Wayne Decker, Hong Yao, Thomas Calo (2011)
Humor, Gender, and Perceived Leader Effectiveness in ChinaSAM Advanced Management Journal, 76
Panagiotis Gkorezis, E. Petridou, Panteleimon Xanthiakos (2014)
Leader positive humor and organizational cynicism: LMX as a mediatorLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 35
C. Robert, J. Wilbanks (2012)
The Wheel Model of humor: Humor events and affect in organizationsHuman Relations, 65
J. Nahrgang, F. Morgeson, Remus Ilies (2009)
The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over timeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108
S. Raudenbush, A. Bryk (1992)
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
R. Martin (2006)
The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach
R. Martin, Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jean Gray, K. Weir (2003)
Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles QuestionnaireJournal of Research in Personality, 37
R. Clouse, Karen Spurgeon (1995)
Corporate analysis of humor.
Cecily Cooper (2008)
Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process modelHuman Relations, 61
Kristopher Preacher, Zhen Zhang, M. Zyphur (2011)
Alternative Methods for Assessing Mediation in Multilevel Data: The Advantages of Multilevel SEMStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18
R. Martin (2007)
CHAPTER 5 – The Social Psychology of Humor
G. Chen, R. Martin (2007)
A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students, 20
Forrest Scogin, H. Pollio (1980)
Targeting and the Humorous Episode in Group ProcessHuman Relations, 33
A. Eagly, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt (2001)
The Leadership Styles of Women and MenJournal of Social Issues, 57
B. Avolio, Jane Howell, John Sosik (1999)
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Bottom Line: Humor as a Moderator of Leadership Style EffectsAcademy of Management Journal, 42
G. Graen, Mary Uhl‐Bien (1995)
Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspectiveLeadership Quarterly, 6
R. Wyer, James Collins (1992)
A theory of humor elicitation.Psychological review, 99 4
P. Malone (1980)
Humor: A Double-Edged Tool for Today’s Managers?Academy of Management Review, 5
Thomas Rockstuhl, James Dulebohn, Soon Ang, L. Shore (2012)
Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture: a meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries.The Journal of applied psychology, 97 6
James Dulebohn, W. Bommer, R. Liden, Robyn Brouer, G. Ferris (2012)
A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member ExchangeJournal of Management, 38
E. Lawler, C. Cammann, David Nadler, D. Jenkins (2013)
Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire
Jenepher Terrion, Blake Ashforth (2002)
From ‘I’ to ‘We’: The Role of Putdown Humor and Identity in the Development of a Temporary GroupHuman Relations, 55
O. Lynch (2002)
Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research.Communication Theory, 12
Herman Aguinis, R. Gottfredson, S. Culpepper (2013)
Best-Practice Recommendations for Estimating Cross-Level Interaction Effects Using Multilevel ModelingJournal of Management, 39
Associate Editor: Lisa Finkelstein Acceptance Date: 30
Wayne Decker, Denise Rotondo (2001)
Relationships among Gender, Type of Humor, and Perceived Leader EffectivenessJournal of Managerial Issues, 13
S. Kazarian, R. Martin (2004)
Humour styles, personality, and well‐being among Lebanese university studentsEuropean Journal of Personality, 18
Kristopher Preacher, M. Zyphur, Zhen Zhang (2010)
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.Psychological methods, 15 3
Are funny people more successful in business
M. Eberly, Christina Fong (2013)
Leading via the heart and mind: The roles of leader and follower emotions, attributions and interdependenceLeadership Quarterly, 24
(2000)
Relationship between executives’ spontaneous use of humor and effective leadership
N. Norrick (2003)
Issues in conversational jokingJournal of Pragmatics, 35
Murray Davis (1993)
What's so Funny?: The Comic Conception of Culture and Society
G. Graen, M. Novak, Patricia Sommerkamp (1982)
The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30
M. Croon, M. Veldhoven (2007)
Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model.Psychological methods, 12 1
Kristopher Preacher, P. Curran, Daniel Bauer (2006)
Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve AnalysisJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31
C. Ember, M. Ember (2000)
Cross-Cultural Research Methods
Jessica Mesmer-Magnus, D. Glew, C. Viswesvaran (2012)
A meta‐analysis of positive humor in the workplaceJournal of Managerial Psychology, 27
D. Watson, L. Clark, A. Tellegen (1988)
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 6
R. Priest, Jordan Swain (2002)
Humor and its implications for leadership effectivenessHumor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15
(2002)
No laughing matter: The impact of supervisor humor on leadermember exchange (LMX) quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
(2012)
Humor that works: 501 ways to use humor
R. Hassad (2010)
Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring Instructors' Attitudes toward Concept-Based or Reform-Oriented Teaching of Introductory Statistics in the Health and Behavioral Sciences
D. Hofmann, M. Gavin (1998)
Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in OrganizationsJournal of Management, 24
Conventional wisdom from the popular and scholarly literatures consistently suggests that positive humor by leaders can be beneficial, but that negative humor should be avoided at all costs. To explore the boundaries of that conventional wisdom, we draw on leadership and humor theory to develop and test a conceptual model describing the relationships between leader humor, leader–subordinate relationship quality, the subordinate’s tenure with the leader, and subordinate job satisfaction. Analysis of multilevel data from 241 subordinates nested within 70 leaders in 54 organizations revealed that the relationship between leader humor and job satisfaction was dependent on the quality of the leader–subordinate relationship, and not the positive/negative tone of the leader’s humor. Specifically, both positive and negative (i.e., affiliative and aggressive) leader humor styles were positively associated with job satisfaction when the relationship was positive, but both types were negatively associated with job satisfaction when the relationship was negative. Our results also suggested that the effects of positive humor increased with increasing subordinate tenure. We discuss the practical implications of these findings, including the importance of understanding the relational context of humor.
Group & Organization Management: An International Journal – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.