Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1989)
Robust statistics - how not to reject outliers . Part 1 , basic concepts
R. Garrett (1969)
The determination of sampling and analytical errors in exploration geochemistryEconomic Geology, 64
(2007)
Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling
(2001)
Robust statistics: a method of coping with outliersAnal Methods Comm AMC Tech Brief, 6
PJ Rousseeuw, V Sabine (2002)
Robust estimation in very small samplesComput Stat Data Anal, 40
M. Ramsey, M. Thompson, M. Hale (1992)
Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of varianceJournal of Geochemical Exploration, 44
R. Garrett, T. Goss (1980)
Uanova: a fortran IV program for unbalanced nested analysis of varianceComputers & Geosciences, 6
M. Ramsey (1998)
Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sourcesJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 13
J. Lyn, M. Ramsey, D. Coad, A. Damant, R. Wood, K. Boon (2007)
The duplicate method of uncertainty estimation: are eight targets enough?The Analyst, 132 11
P. Rousseeuw, Sabine Verboben (2002)
Robust estimation in very small samplesQuality Engineering, 48
There is an increasing appreciation that the uncertainty in environmental measurements is vitally important for their reliable interpretation. However, the adoption of methods to estimate this uncertainty has been limited by the extra cost of implementation. One method that can be used to estimate the random components of uncertainty in the sampling and analytical processes requires the collection of duplicate samples at 10% of the primary sampling locations and duplicating the analyses of these samples. A new program has been written and applied to a modified experimental design to enable a 33% reduction in the cost of analysing this 10% subset, whilst accommodating outlying values. This unbalanced robust analysis of variance (U-RANOVA) uses an unbalanced rather than the balanced experimental design usually employed. Simulation techniques have been used to validate the results of the program, by comparison of the results between the proposed unbalanced and the established balanced designs. Comparisons are also made against the seed parameters (mean and standard deviation) used to simulate the parent population, prior to the addition of a proportion (up to 10%) of outlying values. Application to a large number of different simulated populations shows that U-RANOVA produces results that are effectively indistinguishable from the results produced by the accepted balanced approach and are equally close to the true (seed) parameters of the parent normal population.
Accreditation and Quality Assurance – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 15, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.