Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Walsh (2016b)
Applying a family resilience framework in training, practice, and research: Mastering the art of the possibleFamily Process, 55
E. J. Maher, L. A. Marcynyszyn, T. W. Corwin, R. Hodnett (2011)
Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the Nurturing Parenting Program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatmentChildren and Youth Services Review, 33
M. Ungar (2013)
Resilience after maltreatment: The importance of social services as facilitators of positive adaptationChild Abuse & Neglect, 37
J. Kim, M. E. McCullough, D. Cicchetti (2009)
Parents? and children?s religiosity and child behavioral adjustment among maltreated and nonmaltreated childrenJournal of Child Family Studies, 18
W. J. Mullin, M. Arce (2008)
Resilience of families living in povertyJournal of Family Social Work, 11
V. Clemens, O. Berthold, A. Witt, C. Sachser, E. Brähler, P. L. Plener, Bernhard Strauß, J. M. Fegert (2019)
Child maltreatment is mediating long-term consequences of household dysfunction in a population representative sampleEuropean Psychiatry, 58
A. S. Masten (2001)
Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in developmentAmerican Psychologist, 56
L. J. Proctor, G. A. Aarons, H. Dubowitz, D. J. English, T. Lewis, R. Thompson, J. M. Hussey, A. J. Litrownik, S. C. Roesch (2012)
Trajectories of maltreatment re-reports from ages 4 to 12: Evidence for persistent risk after early exposureChild Maltreatment, 17
J. C. Schreiber, M. J. Culbertson (2014)
Religious socialization of youth involved in child welfareChild Abuse & Neglect, 38
S. Presser, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, J. M. Rothgeb, E. Singer (2004)
Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 68
F. Walsh (2002)
A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applicationsFamily Relations, 51
D. R. Hawley (2000)
Clinical implications of family resilienceAmerican Journal of Family Therapy, 28
R. E. Norman, M. Byambaa, R. De, A. Butchart, J. Scott, T. Vos (2012)
The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS Medicine, 9
N. B. Epstein, L. M. Baldwin, D. S. Bishop (1983)
The McMaster Family Assessment DeviceJournal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9
F. Walsh (2016a)
Family resilience: A developmental systems frameworkEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13
K. U. Lindell, C. K. Sorenson, S. V. Mangold (2020)
The Family First Prevention Services Act: A new era of child welfare reformPublic Health Reports, 135
M. Lalayants, A. Oyo, J. D. Prince (2020)
Religiosity and outcomes among child welfare-involved youthChild and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37
E. Putnam-Hornstein, B. Needell, A. E. Rhodes (2013)
Understanding risk and protective factors for child maltreatment: The value of integrated, population- based dataChild Abuse & Neglect, 37
C. S. Widom, S. J. Czaja, T. Bentley, M. S. Johnson (2012)
A prospective investigation of physical health outcomes in abused and neglected children: New findings from a 30-year follow-upAmerican Journal of Public Health, 102
Efforts to prevent child abuse and neglect have primarily focused on family deficits, including poverty and parental psychopathology. Models of resiliency, which are focused instead on family adaptation and strengths, offer an alternative to deficit-based practices. Although child-focused resilience studies are common in the field of child welfare, few focus on parents. The authors employed a mixed-methods study to understand how mothers involved in child welfare use resiliency strategies—including belief systems, organizational patterns, and open communication—to overcome adversities. Mothers (N = 129) at risk for child welfare involvement completed a quantitative survey, with 38 completing a follow-up qualitative phone interview. Both survey and interview asked a variety of questions on everyday adversities and coping. Two mothers were assessed as nonresilient. However, a majority of mothers exhibited resiliency, including consistent daily routines, peaceful homes, and family mealtimes. A strong aspirational belief system, not necessarily stemming from a faith tradition or community, provided both parents and children hope in times of trouble. Further, open communication with children about stressors was common. The authors’ results showed that resiliency strategies are being utilized by families typically defined as “at-risk,” and that child welfare professionals should consider focusing prevention efforts more on family strengths than on shortcomings.
Social Work Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 4, 2022
Keywords: child welfare; mixed methods; risk and resilience
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.