Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Kettle, A. Beck, L. O'toole, F. Jones, R. Short (1997)
Plasma polymerisation for molecular engineering of carbon-fibre surfaces for optimised compositesComposites Science and Technology, 57
S. Zhandarov, E. Pisanova (1997)
The local bond strength and its determination by fragmentation and pull-out testsComposites Science and Technology, 57
I. Rashkovan, Yu. Korabel'nikov (1997)
The effect of fiber surface treatment on its strength and adhesion to the matrixComposites Science and Technology, 57
C. Pittman, W. Jiang, Guoren He, S. Gardner (1998)
Oxygen plasma and isobutylene plasma treatments of carbon fibers: Determination of surface functionality and effects on composite propertiesCarbon, 36
R. Moreton (1969)
The effect of gauge length on the tensile strength of R.A.E. carbon fibresFibre Science and Technology, 1
T. Tagawa, T. Miyata (1997)
Size effect on tensile strength of carbon fibersMaterials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 238
Z. Chi, T. Chou, G. Shen (1984)
Determination of single fibre strength distribution from fibre bundle testingsJournal of Materials Science, 19
A. Kelly, W. Tyson (1965)
Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: Copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenumJournal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 13
(1975)
Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength and Young's Modulus for High‐Modulus Single‐Filament Materials
The tensile behavior of carbon fibers shows large scattering. This is due to the fiber itself and the testing operations. Because of the high tenacity and modulus, low strain, and easy breakability in bending, not only is the tensile test for single carbon fibers extremely difficult, but the measured results are also oppugned. To achieve a reliable and accurate characterization, several factors influencing the objective and exact testing of single carbon fibers have been measured and discussed, including the wrong pretension, nonaxial stretching, and adhesion effects. The experimental results indicate that the error of strain causing them ranges from 1.5 to 12.3%. Because of the typical linear stress–strain curves of carbon fibers, the ratio of the strain error to the modulus error is approximately equal to 1 : 1, so the calibration of the measured strain must be conducted for the accurate evaluation of the modulus and itself. The calibration is put forward. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 2625–2632, 2007
Journal of Applied Polymer Science – Wiley
Published: Jan 15, 2007
Keywords: ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.