Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Y. Shoda, W. Mischel, P. Peake (1990)
Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions.Developmental Psychology, 26
N. Neef, Megan Lutz (2001)
A brief computer-based assessment of reinforcer dimensions affecting choice.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 34 1
T. Critchfield, S. Kollins (2001)
Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 34 1
D. Cantwell, L. Baker (1991)
Association Between Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder and Learning DisordersJournal of Learning Disabilities, 24
N. Purdie, J. Hattie, A. Carroll (2002)
A Review of the Research on Interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: What Works Best?Review of Educational Research, 72
J. Rabe‐Jabłońska (1993)
[Affective disorders in the fourth edition of the classification of mental disorders prepared by the American Psychiatric Association -- diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders].Psychiatria polska, 27 3
Rachlin Rachlin (1974)
Self‐controlBehaviorism, 2
K. Jackson, T. Hackenberg (1996)
Token reinforcement, choice, and self-control in pigeons.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 66 1
B. Iwata, G. Pace, M. Dorsey, J. Zarcone, T. Vollmer, Richard Smith, T. Rodgers, D. Lerman, B. Shore, J. Mazaleski, H. Goh, Glynnis Cowdery, M. Kalsher, Kay McCosh, K. Willis (1994)
The functions of self-injurious behavior: an experimental-epidemiological analysis.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 27 2
R. Barkley, M. Fischer, C. Edelbrock, Lori Smallish (1990)
The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria: I. An 8-year prospective follow-up study.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29 4
N. Neef, David Bicard, Sayaka Endo (2001)
Assessment of impulsivity and the development of self-control in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 34 4
S. Campbell, Elizabeth Pierce, Cynthia March, L. Ewing, E. Szumowski (1994)
Hard-to-manage preschool boys: symptomatic behavior across contexts and time.Child development, 65 3
N. Neef, Megan Lutz (2001)
Assessment of Variables Affecting Choice and Application to Classroom InterventionsSchool Psychology Quarterly, 16
J. Halperin (1999)
ADHD and the Nature of Self-ControlPsychiatric Services, 50
C. Conners (2000)
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder—historical development and overview.Journal of Attention Disorders
Summarize the general results of the between-groups comparison with respect to time and response allocation
N. Neef, F. Mace, D. Shade (1993)
Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 26 1
N. Neef, D. Shade, Mark Miller (1994)
Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 27 4
N. Neef, David Bicard, Sayaka Endo, D. Coury, M. Aman (2005)
Evaluation of pharmacological treatment of impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 38 2
L. Cooper, D. Wacker, G. Sasso, T. Reimers, L. Donn (1990)
Using parents as therapists to evaluate appropriate behavior of their children: application to a tertiary diagnostic clinic.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 23 3
We conducted a brief computer‐based assessment involving choices of concurrently presented arithmetic problems associated with competing reinforcer dimensions to assess impulsivity (choices controlled primarily by reinforcer immediacy) as well as the relative influence of other dimensions (reinforcer rate, quality, and response effort), with 58 children. Results were compared for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who were and were not receiving medication, and with typically developing children without ADHD. Within‐subject and between‐groups analyses of the ordinal influence of each of the reinforcer dimensions were conducted using both time‐ and response‐allocation measures. In general, the choices of children with ADHD were most influenced by reinforcer immediacy and quality and least by rate and effort, suggesting impulsivity. The choices of children in the non‐ADHD group were most influenced by reinforcer quality, and the influence of immediacy relative to the other dimensions was not statistically significant. Results are discussed with respect to the implications for assessment and treatment of ADHD.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.