Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Leiponen, Constance Helfat (2010)
INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTHSouthern Medical Journal, 31
P. Windrum, M. García-Goñi (2008)
A neo-Schumpeterian model of health services innovationResearch Policy, 37
F. Damanpour, C. Avellaneda (2009)
Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service OrganizationsIO: Productivity
J. Hartley (2005)
Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and PresentPublic Money & Management, 25
R. Wagner (1997)
Choice, Exchange, and Public FinanceThe American Economic Review, 87
E. Vigoda‐Gadot (2003)
Managing Collaboration in Public Administration: Governance, Businesses, and Citizens in the Service of Modern Society
Luise Langergaard, J. Scheuer (2012)
Towards a Deeper Understanding of Public Sector Innovation
P. D’Este, S. Iammarino, M. Savona, N. Tunzelmann (2012)
What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriersResearch Policy, 41
N. Amara, Réjean Landry, N. Traoré (2008)
Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge-intensive business servicesResearch Policy, 37
S. Ross (1973)
The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's ProblemThe American Economic Review, 63
E. Vigoda-Gadot, Aviv Shoham, N. Schwabsky, Ayalla Ruvio (2005)
Public sector innovation for the managerial and the post-managerial era: Promises and realities in a globalizing public administrationInternational Public Management Journal, 8
Birkinshaw Birkinshaw, Hamel Hamel, Mol Mol (2008)
Management InnovationAcademy of Management Review, 33
R. Walker (2006)
INNOVATION TYPE AND DIFFUSION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTPublic Administration, 84
A. Arundel, D. Huber (2013)
From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sectorStructural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27
G. Boyne, J. Gould-Williams, Jennifer Law, R. Walker (2005)
Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Management ReformEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23
P. Windrum, P. Koch (2008)
Innovation in Public Sector Services
M. Moon (1999)
The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship: Does organization matter?Public Administration Review, 59
B. Bozeman, S. Bretschneider (1994)
The "Publicness Puzzle" in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations*Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4
S. Shin, Tae-Yeol Kim, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Lin Bian (2012)
Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level InteractionAcademy of Management Journal, 55
E. Kiser (1999)
Comparing Varieties of Agency Theory in Economics, Political Science, and Sociology: An Illustration from State Policy Implementation*Sociological Theory, 17
Abernathy (1978)
Patterns of Industrial InnovationTechnological Review, 80
S. Borins (2002)
Leadership and innovation in the public sectorLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 23
Leiponen Leiponen, Helfat Helfat (2010)
Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources and the Benefits of BreadthStrategic Management Journal, 31
R. Walker, F. Damanpour, C. Devece (2011)
Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance ManagementJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21
H. Rainey, Barry Bozeman (2000)
Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A PrioriJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10
R. Walker (2007)
An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration FrameworkJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
Sergio Fernandez, David Pitts (2011)
Understanding Employee Motivation to Innovate: Evidence from Front Line Employees in United States Federal AgenciesAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 70
Using data from a nationally representative survey of all Australian Government employees, we explore the nature of innovation implemented at the workgroup level and assess the multi‐dimensionality of the workgroup's ‘most significant innovation’ (MSI). Of the 10222 survey respondents, 48% reported at least one innovation implemented by their workgroup, with an innovation more commonly reported with an increase in the respondent's age, seniority, and service experience; among men and university graduates. The results reveal that 54% of the reported MSIs incorporate between two and five dimensions of innovation types (policy, service, service delivery, administrative/organizational, and conceptual), and most of these dimensions reinforce each other. Different dimensions of the MSI draw on different sources of ideas (with senior leaders having the broadest impact), face different ‘revealed’ barriers, require different levels of workplace creativity, and produce different beneficial effects. Our findings help strengthen an understanding of the influencing factors and the effects of multi‐dimensional public sector innovations.
Australian Journal of Public Administration – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2016
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.