Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Cao, Dennis Phd, D. Sherrill, Yiping Du (1995)
Abbreviated moment‐compensated phase encodingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 34
D. Nishimura, J.I. Jackson, J. Pauly (1991)
On the nature and reduction of the displacement artifact in flow imagesMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 22
(1990)
Society of magnetic resonance in medicineMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 16
D. Nishimura, Pablo Irarrazabal, C. Meyer (1995)
A Velocity k‐Space Analysis of Flow Effects in Echo‐Planar and Spiral ImagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 33
Haacke Haacke, Lenz Lenz (1987)
Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradientsAm J Roentgenol, 148
K. Butts, S. Riederer (1992)
Analysis of flow effects in echo‐planar imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2
D. Firmin, R. Klipstein, G. Hounsfield, M. Paley, D. Longmore (1989)
Echo‐planar high‐resolution flow velocity mappingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 12
(1994)
MRA of the grain [abs&ct)
E. Haacke, G. Lenz (1987)
Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradients.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 148 6
J. Duerk, O. Simonetti (1991)
Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1
P. Jezzard, R. Balaban (1995)
Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variationsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 34
Gerard Pat, C. Meyer, J. Pauly, D. Nishimura (1997)
Reducing flow artifacts in echo‐planar imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 37
F. Jaffer, H. Wen, R. Balaban, S. Wolff (1996)
A method to improve the BO homogeneity of the heart in vivoMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 36
P. Pattany, J. Phillips, L. Chiu, James Lipcamon, J. Duerk, James Mcnally, S. Mohapatra (1987)
Motion artifact suppression technique (MAST) for MR imaging.Journal of computer assisted tomography, 11 3
O. Simonetti, R. Wendt, J. Duerk (1991)
Significance of the point of expansion in interpretation of gradient moments and motion sensitivityJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1
D. Feinberg, R. Turner, P. Jakab, M. Kienlin (1990)
Echo‐planar imaging with asymmetric gradient modulation and inner‐volume excitationMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 13
P. Mansfield (1977)
Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoesJournal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 10
(1990)
Flow sensitivity and flow compensation in instant imaging (abstract
(1993)
Quantification and comparison of flow distortion for fast imaging ( abstract ]
Shim insensitive phase correction for EPl using a two echo reference scan ( abstract )
C. Davis, G. Mckinnon, J. Debatin, D. Wetter, A. Eichenberger, S. Duewell, G. Schulthess (1994)
Normal heart: evaluation with echo-planar MR imaging.Radiology, 191 3
(1995)
Flow effects in interleaved echo - planar and spiral imaging ( abstract )
L. Frank, A. Crawley, R. Buxton (1992)
Elimination of oblique flow artifacts in magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 25
Pattany Pattany, Phillips Phillips, Chiu Chiu (1987)
Motion artifact suppression technique (MAST) for MR imaging: superiority over cardiac gating for reducing phase‐shift artifactsJ Comput Assist Tomogr, 11
Echo‐planar imaging (EPI) is sensitive to motion despite its rapid data acquisition rate. Compared with traditional imaging techniques, it is more sensitive to motion or flow in the phase‐encode direction, which can cause image artifacts such as ghosting, misregistration, and loss of spatial resolution. Consequently, EPI of dynamic structures (eg, the cardiovascular system) could benefit from methods that eliminate these artifacts. In this paper, two methods of artifact reduction for motion in the phase‐encode direction are evaluated. First, the k‐space trajectory is evaluated by comparing centric with top‐down ordered sequences. Next, velocity gradient moment nulling (GMN) of the phase‐encode direction is evaluated for each trajectory. Computer simulations and experiments in flow phantoms and rabbits in vivo show that uncompensated centric ordering produces the highest image quality. This is probably due to a shorter readout duration, which reduces T2* relaxation losses and off‐resonance effects, and to the linear geometry of phantoms and vessels, which can obscure centric blurring artifacts.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.