Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model

Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified... Implicit solvation models provide, for many applications, a reasonably accurate and computationally effective way to describe the electrostatics of aqueous solvation. Here, a popular analytical Generalized Born (GB) solvation model is modified to improve its accuracy in calculating the solvent polarization part of free energy changes in large‐scale conformational transitions, such as protein folding. In contrast to an earlier GB model (implemented in the AMBER‐6 program), the improved version does not overstabilize the native structures relative to the finite‐difference Poisson–Boltzmann continuum treatment. In addition to improving the energy balance between folded and unfolded conformers, the algorithm (available in the AMBER‐7 and NAB molecular modeling packages) is shown to perform well in more than 50 ns of native‐state molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of thioredoxin, protein‐A, and ubiquitin, as well as in a simulation of Barnase/Barstar complex formation. For thioredoxin, various combinations of input parameters have been explored, such as the underlying gas‐phase force fields and the atomic radii. The best performance is achieved with a previously proposed modification to the torsional potential in the Amber ff99 force field, which yields stable native trajectories for all of the tested proteins, with backbone root‐mean‐square deviations from the native structures being ∼1.5 Å after 6 ns of simulation time. The structure of Barnase/Barstar complex is regenerated, starting from an unbound state, to within 1.9 Å relative to the crystal structure of the complex. Proteins 2004;55:000–000. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Proteins: Structure Function and Bioinformatics Wiley

Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/exploring-protein-native-states-and-large-scale-conformational-changes-EvcS3T7cY0

References (39)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Subscription Services
ISSN
0887-3585
eISSN
1097-0134
DOI
10.1002/prot.20033
pmid
15048829
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Implicit solvation models provide, for many applications, a reasonably accurate and computationally effective way to describe the electrostatics of aqueous solvation. Here, a popular analytical Generalized Born (GB) solvation model is modified to improve its accuracy in calculating the solvent polarization part of free energy changes in large‐scale conformational transitions, such as protein folding. In contrast to an earlier GB model (implemented in the AMBER‐6 program), the improved version does not overstabilize the native structures relative to the finite‐difference Poisson–Boltzmann continuum treatment. In addition to improving the energy balance between folded and unfolded conformers, the algorithm (available in the AMBER‐7 and NAB molecular modeling packages) is shown to perform well in more than 50 ns of native‐state molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of thioredoxin, protein‐A, and ubiquitin, as well as in a simulation of Barnase/Barstar complex formation. For thioredoxin, various combinations of input parameters have been explored, such as the underlying gas‐phase force fields and the atomic radii. The best performance is achieved with a previously proposed modification to the torsional potential in the Amber ff99 force field, which yields stable native trajectories for all of the tested proteins, with backbone root‐mean‐square deviations from the native structures being ∼1.5 Å after 6 ns of simulation time. The structure of Barnase/Barstar complex is regenerated, starting from an unbound state, to within 1.9 Å relative to the crystal structure of the complex. Proteins 2004;55:000–000. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Journal

Proteins: Structure Function and Bioinformatics – Wiley

Published: Jan 1, 2004

Keywords: ; ;

There are no references for this article.