Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2006)
Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation User Manual Version 2.0.0
K. Kawashima, G. Watanabe (2006)
Seismic performance of unbonded columns and isolator built-in columns based on cyclic loading tests
David Hieber, J. Wacker, M. Eberhard, J. Stanton (2005)
Precast Concrete Pier Systems for Rapid Construction of Bridges in Seismic Regions
C. Chou, Yu-Chih Chen (2006)
Cyclic tests of post‐tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strandsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35
(2010)
Precast Bridge Concrete Columns with Energy Dissipating Joint
(1989)
Mechanics of Low Shape Factor Elastomeric Seismic Isolation Bearings
M. Priestley, Gregory MacRae (1996)
Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendonsPci Journal, 41
(2006)
Seismic Performance of Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Columns Constructed with Precast Segments
Joshua Hewes, M. Priestley (2002)
SEISMIC DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF PRECAST CONCRETE SEGMENTAL BRIDGE COLUMNS
(1997)
Seismic Design of Bridge Piers Based on Damage Avoidance Design
S. Billington, R. Barnes, J. Breen (1999)
A PRECAST SEGMENTAL SUBSTRUCTURE SYSTEM FOR STANDARD BRIDGESPci Journal, 44
(2004)
Analytical Investigations of New Methods for Reducing Residual Displacements of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns
Two one-third-scale precast concrete segmental column models with energy-dissipating plastic hinges were designed and tested on a shake table at the University of Nevada, Reno. Conventional reinforced concrete was used in the plastic hinge of one column (SC-2). In the other model, a built-in elastomeric pad integrated with the footing and a concrete segment constituted the plastic hinge (SBR-1). The purpose of using the pad was to minimize damage while dissipating energy through yielding of the longitudinal bars and deformation of the pad. Both columns were subjected to the same ground motion as was recorded at the Sylmar station during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake with increasing amplitudes until failure. Compared with conventional precast concrete segmental columns, both SC-2 and SBR-1 showed superior performance, such as minimal residual displacement and larger energy dissipation. SBR-1 with the elastomeric bearing pad dissipated more energy and was free from damage in the plastic hinge zone.
Transportation Research Record – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.