Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION COST AND UNCERTAINTY ON MIGRATION: A COMPARISON OF MIGRANT TYPES *

THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION COST AND UNCERTAINTY ON MIGRATION: A COMPARISON OF MIGRANT TYPES * 1. INTRODUCTION Theoretical and econometric models of migration behavior have ignored the varying influences of the determinants of migration on types of migrants. Traditionally the disaggregation of migration data has been into homogeneous groups according to race, sex, age or education. While the need for studying types of migrants has been generally recognized, the lack of data has been proposed as prohibiting such an analysis. (See, for example, Bowman and Myers [2], Eldridge [3], Langley 161 and Miller [8].) The failure of previous econometric studies to consider types of migrants has resulted in a specification bias due to aggregation errors. The theoretical framework for migration is usually based on the assumption that migration is an investment which entails costs as well as produces benefits. Individuals are more likely to migrate from region A to region B , the greater the net benefits which are accrued from such a movement. Net benefit is a function of economic and noneconomic factors and the influence of these factors, because of incomplete information and uncertainty, varies with the type of migrant. Recent studies of migration in Canada by Vanderkamp [14, 15, 161 indicate that the effects of these factors in explaining migration http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Regional Science Wiley

THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION COST AND UNCERTAINTY ON MIGRATION: A COMPARISON OF MIGRANT TYPES *

Journal of Regional Science , Volume 17 (1) – Apr 1, 1977

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-influence-of-information-cost-and-uncertainty-on-migration-a-DrnU90jStr

References (17)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0022-4146
eISSN
1467-9787
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9787.1977.tb00476.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION Theoretical and econometric models of migration behavior have ignored the varying influences of the determinants of migration on types of migrants. Traditionally the disaggregation of migration data has been into homogeneous groups according to race, sex, age or education. While the need for studying types of migrants has been generally recognized, the lack of data has been proposed as prohibiting such an analysis. (See, for example, Bowman and Myers [2], Eldridge [3], Langley 161 and Miller [8].) The failure of previous econometric studies to consider types of migrants has resulted in a specification bias due to aggregation errors. The theoretical framework for migration is usually based on the assumption that migration is an investment which entails costs as well as produces benefits. Individuals are more likely to migrate from region A to region B , the greater the net benefits which are accrued from such a movement. Net benefit is a function of economic and noneconomic factors and the influence of these factors, because of incomplete information and uncertainty, varies with the type of migrant. Recent studies of migration in Canada by Vanderkamp [14, 15, 161 indicate that the effects of these factors in explaining migration

Journal

Journal of Regional ScienceWiley

Published: Apr 1, 1977

There are no references for this article.