Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Greenfield, K. Enslein, A. Ralston, H. Wilf (1980)
Statistical Methods for Digital Computers.Applied statistics, 27
J. Bunch, L. Kaufman, B. Parlett (1976)
Decomposition of a symmetric matrixNumerische Mathematik, 27
J. Smith (1963)
An analysis of critical features of letters, tested by a confusion matrix
J. D. Carroll (1979)
A three-way approach to clustering. Paper presented at meeting of Psychometric Society
A. Tversky (1977)
Features of SimilarityPsychological Review, 84
J. D. Carroll (1975)
Carroll, J. D., & Pruzansky, S.Fitting of hierarchical tree structure (HTS) models, mixtures of HTS models, and hybrid models, via mathematical programming and alternating least squares. Paper presented at the U.S.-Japan Seminar on Multidimensional Scaling, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, August 20–24, 1975.
J. Kruskal (1964)
Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesisPsychometrika, 29
Lawrence J. Personal communication Hubert (1978)
Hubert, Lawrence J. Personal communication, 1978.
J. Ramsay (1977)
Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scalingPsychometrika, 42
T. Sørensen, T. Sørensen, T. Biering-Sørensen, Tia Sørensen, J. Sorensen (1948)
A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons
G. Miller, P. Nicely (1955)
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English ConsonantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27
C. Krumhansl (1978)
Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density.Psychological Review, 85
D. Klatt (1968)
Structure of confusions in short-term memory between English consonants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44 2
P. Florence, F. Roethlisberger, William Dickson (1941)
Management and the Worker
P. Ivanescu, S. Rudeanu (1966)
Pseudo-Boolean Methods for Bivalent Programming
R. Shepard, P. Arabie (1979)
Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties.Psychological Review, 86
S. Robinson (1979)
Quadratic Interpolation is Risky.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 16
L. Hubert (1973)
Monotone invariant clustering proceduresPsychometrika, 38
L. Hubert (1972)
Some extensions of Johnson's hierarchical clustering algorithmsPsychometrika, 37
J. Carroll, J. Chang (1970)
Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decompositionPsychometrika, 35
W. Wickelgren (1966)
Distinctive features and errors in short-term memory for English consonants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39 2
J. Kruskal (1964)
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical methodPsychometrika, 29
A. Liberman, P. Delattre, F. Cooper (1952)
The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants.The American journal of psychology, 65 4
L. Katz (1947)
On the Matric Analysis of Sociometric Data, 10
S. Soli, P. Arabie (1979)
Auditory versus phonetic accounts of observed confusions between consonant phonemes.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66 1
K. Banerjee, C. Rao, S. Mitra (1973)
Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its ApplicationsTechnometrics, 15
E. Peay (1975)
Nonmetric grouping: Clusters and cliquesPsychometrika, 40
J. B. Seery (1973)
How to use KYST, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding
M. Wang, R. Bilger (1973)
Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54 5
J. Lackner, L. Goldstein (1975)
The Psychological Representation of Speech SoundsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27
A. Liberman, F. Cooper, D. Shankweiler, M. Studdert-Kennedy (1967)
Perception of the speech code.Psychological review, 74 6
W. Kruskal (1975)
The Geometry of Generalized InversesJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 37
R. N. Shepard (1975)
Shepard, R. N., & Crawford, G.Multidimensional scaling based on the fitting of constrained difference functions. Paper presented at the U.S.-Japan Seminar on Multidimensional Scaling, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, August 20–24, 1975.
P. Adby, M. Dempster (1974)
Introduction to optimization methods
C. Banfield, L. Bassill (1977)
Algorithm AS 113: A Transfer for Non-Hierarchical ClassificationApplied statistics, 26
J. Kruskal (1969)
Extremely portable random number generatorCommun. ACM, 12
P. Podgorny, W. Garner (1979)
Reaction time as a measure of inter- and intraobject visual similarity: Letters of the alphabetPerception & Psychophysics, 26
James Cunningham, R. Shepard (1974)
Monotone mapping of similarities into a general metric spaceJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 11
R. Shepard (1962)
The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. IIPsychometrika, 27
J. Moon, L. Moser (1965)
On cliques in graphsIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 3
L. Hubert, F. Baker (1977)
Analyzing Distinctive FeaturesJournal of Educational Statistics, 2
R. Jakobson, C. Fant, M. Halle (1961)
Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates
J. J. Chang (1966)
Chang, J. J., & Shepard, R. N.Exponential fitting in the proximity analysis of confusion matrices. Presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,New York, April 14, 1966.
Abstract We present a new algorithm, MAPCLUS (MAthematicalProgrammingCLUStering), for fitting the Shepard-Arabie ADCLUS (forADditiveCLUStering) model. MAPCLUS utilizes an alternating least squares method combined with a mathematical programming optimization procedure based on a penalty function approach, to impose discrete (0,1) constraints on parameters defining cluster membership. This procedure is supplemented by several other numerical techniques (notably a heuristically based combinatorial optimization procedure) to provide an efficient general-purpose computer implemented algorithm for obtaining ADCLUS representations. MAPCLUS is illustrated with an application to one of the examples given by Shepard and Arabie using the older ADCLUS procedure. The MAPCLUS solution uses half as many clusters to achieve nearly the same level of goodness-of-fit. Finally, we consider an extension of the present approach to fitting a three-way generalization of the ADCLUS model, called INDCLUS (INdividualDifferencesCLUStering).
Psychometrika – Cambridge University Press
Published: Jun 1, 1980
Keywords: Psychometrics; Assessment, Testing and Evaluation; Statistics for Social Sciences, Humanities, Law; Statistical Theory and Methods
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.