Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/intellectual-evaluations-of-children-using-human-figure-drawings-an-DXXuceZgT6
References (11)
-
Aikman Aikman, Belter Belter, Finch Finch (1992)
Human figure drawings: Validity in assessing intellectual level and academic achievementJournal of Clinical Psychology, 48
-
Kahill Kahill (1984)
Human figure drawings in adults: An update of the empirical evidenceCanadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 25
-
Fabry Fabry, Bertinetti Bertinetti (1990)
A construct validation study of the human figure drawing testPerceptual and Motor Skills, 70
-
Ricci Ricci (1894)
The art of children. (D. Maitland, Trans.)Pedagogical Seminar, 3
-
Gayton Gayton, Tavormina Tavormina, Evans Evans, Scheh Scheh (1974)
Comparative validity of Harris' and Koppitz' scoring systems for human‐figure drawingsPerceptual and Motor Skills, 39
-
Jegede Jegede, Bamgboye Bamgboye (1981)
Intellectual maturity in Nigerian primary school childrenSouth African Journal of Psychology, 11
-
Cooke Cooke (1885)
Art teaching and child natureLondon Journal of Education, 2
-
Groves Groves, Fried Fried (1991)
Developmental items on children's human figure drawings: A replication and extension of Koppitz to younger childrenJournal of Clinical Psychology, 47
-
Swensen Swensen (1968)
Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957–1966Psychological Bulletin, 70
-
Roback Roback (1968)
Human figure drawings: Their utility in the clinical psychologist's armamentarium for personality assessmentPsychological Bulletin, 70
-
Swensen Swensen (1957)
Empirical investigations of human figure drawingsPsychological Bulletin, 54
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
- eISSN
- 1097-4679
- DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199601)52:1<67::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO;2-T
- pmid
- 8682914
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This study evaluated the scoring systems of Goodenough and Harris (1963) and Koppitz (1968) for using human figure drawings to assess the intellectual abilities of children. Drawing scores of 125 children, aged 5 to 15, were compared to their performance on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children‐Revised (WISC‐R), while the drawing scores of a separate group of 74 children, aged 5 to 12, were compared to their performance on the Stanford‐Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L‐M. While both drawing systems correlated significantly with the WISC‐R as well as the Stanford‐Binet, the longer and more detailed Goodenough‐Harris had a significantly higher correlation with Performance IQ on the WISC‐R than did the Koppitz. Neither drawing system had a pattern of significantly different validity coefficients for children of varying ages or IQ levels. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Journal
Journal of Clinical Psychology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1996