Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Borden (1931)
Some Field Observations On Codling Moth BehaviorJournal of Economic Entomology, 24
(1980)
t~tude des possibilit6s d' application de la lutte par la technique de confusion contre le Carpocapse, Laspeyresia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: ToI~ricidae)
T. Weissling, A. Knight (1994)
Passive Trap for Monitoring Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Flight ActivityJournal of Economic Entomology, 87
M. Yothers (1927)
Summary of Three Years' Tests of Trap Baits for Capturing the Codling MothJournal of Economic Entomology, 20
(1927)
Codling moth traps
L. McDonough, H. Moffitt (1974)
Sex pheromone of the codling moth.Science, 183 4128
D. Hamilton, L. Steiner (1939)
Light Traps and Codling Moth ControlJournal of Economic Entomology, 32
(1985)
SAS User's Guide: Statistics
W. Thwaite, H. Madsen (1983)
THE INFLUENCE OF TRAP DENSITY, TRAP HEIGHT, OUTSIDE TRAPS AND TRAP DESIGN ON CYDIA POMONELLA (L.) CAPTURES WITH SEX PHEROMONE TRAPS IN NEW SOUTH WALES APPLE ORCHARDSAustralian Journal of Entomology, 22
P. McNally, M. Barnes (1981)
Effects of Codling Moth Pheromone Trap Placement, Orientation and Density on Trap CatchesEnvironmental Entomology, 10
M. Barnes, J. Millar, P. Kirsch, D. Hawks (1992)
Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Control by Dissemination of Synthetic Female Sex PheromoneJournal of Economic Entomology, 85
(1927)
Codling moth traps. Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 214
(1974)
Sex pheromones : ( E , E ) - dodecadien - lol in the codling moth
H. Riedl, S. Hoying, W. Barnett, J. Detar (1979)
Relationship of Within-tree Placement of the Pheromone Trap to Codling Moth CatchesEnvironmental Entomology, 8
(1981)
Codling moth : Blacklight trapping and comparisons with fermenting molasses bait and sex pheromone traps
D. Pfeiffer, W. Kaakeh, J. Killian, M. Lachance, P. Kirsch (1993)
Mating disruption for control of damage by codling moth in Virginia apple orchardsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 67
C. Richardson, Robert Chanois (1950)
Codling Moth Infestation of the Tops of Apple Trees.Journal of Economic Entomology, 43
W. Roelofs, A. Comeau, A. Hill, G. Milicevic (1971)
Sex Attractant of the Codling Moth: Characterization with Electroantennogram TechniqueScience, 174
J. Howell, R. Schmidt, D. Horton, S. Khattak, L. White (1990)
Codling Moth: Male Moth Activity in Response to Pheromone Lures and Pheromone-Baited Traps at Different Elevations Within and Between TreesEnvironmental Entomology, 19
(1980)
t~tude des possibilit6s d' application de la lutte par la technique de confusion contre le Carpocapse
(1981)
Codling moth: Blacklight trapping and comparisons with fermenting molasses bait and sex pheromone traps. United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service
J. Howell, A. Knight, T. Unruh, D. Brown, J. Krysan, C. Sell, P. Kirsch (1992)
Control of Codling Moth in Apple and Pear with Sex Pheromone-Mediated Mating DisruptionJournal of Economic Entomology, 85
T. Ahmad, Z. Al‐Gharbawi (1986)
Effects of pheromone trap design and placement on catches of codling moth malesJournal of Applied Entomology, 102
P. Charmillot (1980)
Etude des possibilités d'application de la lutte par la technique de confusion contre le carpocapse, Laspeyresia pomonella L.(Lep.Tortricidae)
(1944)
Codling-moth infestation at different heights in apple trees. Virginia Agricultural Experiments Station Bulletin 360
J. Mulrooney, W. Parrott, J. Jenkins (1992)
Response of Cotton to Damage by Tobacco Budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Changes in Fruit DistributionJournal of Economic Entomology, 85
(1944)
Codling - moth infestation at different heights in apple trees
M. Beroza, B. Bierl, H. Moffitt (1974)
Sex Pheromones: (E,E)-8,10-Dodecadien-1-ol in the Codling MothScience, 183
The vertical distribution of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) within pheromone‐treated and untreated apple and pear orchard canopies was determined using tethered virgin females, unbaited sticky traps, and blacklight observation of released moths. Mating of virgin females tethered at various heights in untreated orchard canopies increased with placement height from 1–4 m. Application of pheromone dispensers for mating disruption at 2 and 4 m above the ground greatly decreased mating. Greatest capture of males and females on unbaited sticky traps occurred at mid‐ and upper‐canopy heights. Total capture of males and females in pheromone‐treated plots was not statistically different than in untreated plots. The percentage of mated females captured on sticky traps did not vary with trap height or pheromone treatment. Released moths marked with fluorescent powder and observed at dark with a blacklight indicated that moths are primarily distributed high in the canopy. However, males shifted to a position lower in the canopy when pheromone dispensers were placed 2.1 m above the ground. Results suggest that pheromone dispensers be placed in the upper canopy for optimal disruption of codling moth mating.
Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Keywords: ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.