Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Singell, James Thornton (1997)
Nepotism, discrimination, and the persistence of utility-maximizing, owner-operated firms: ReplySouthern Economic Journal, 63
P. Bernoux
La sociologie des entreprises
William Dyer (1986)
Cultural Change in Family Firms: Anticipating and Managing Business and Family Transitions
L.‐J. Filion
Vision et relations: clefs de l’entrepreneur
J. Allouche, Bruno Amann, J. Jaussaud, Toshiki Kurashina (2008)
The Impact of Family Control on the Performance and Financial Characteristics of Family Versus Nonfamily Businesses in Japan: A Matched-Pair InvestigationPolitical Methods: Quantitative Methods eJournal
C. Daily, Marc Dollinger (1993)
Alternative Methodologies for Identifying Family- versus Nonfamily-Managed BusinessesJournal of Small Business Management, 31
E. Garcia Alvarez, J. Lopez Sintas
Founder‐successor's transition: a model of coherent value transitions paths
P. Bernoux, H. Amblard, G. Herreros, Y.‐F. Livian
Les nouvelles approches sociologiques des organisations
Ivan Lansberg, J. Astrachan (1994)
Influence of Family Relationships on Succession Planning and Training: The Importance of Mediating FactorsFamily Business Review, 7
Louise Kelly, Nicholas Athanassiou, W. Crittenden (2000)
Founder Centrality and Strategic Behavior in the Family-Owned FirmEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25
R. Brockhaus (1994)
Entrepreneurship and Family Business Research: Comparisons, Critique, and LessonsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19
Pramodita Sharma (2004)
An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the FutureFamily Business Review, 17
M. Vries (1993)
The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news.Organizational Dynamics, 21
M. McCollom (1990)
Problems and Prospects in Clinical Research on Family FirmsFamily Business Review, 3
E. Patton, S. Appelbaum (2003)
The case for case studies in management researchManagement Research News, 26
R. Tagiuri, John Davis (1996)
Bivalent Attributes of the Family FirmFamily Business Review, 9
M. Bauer
Les Patrons de PME entre le Pouvoir, l’Entreprise et la Famille
L. Barnes, Simon Hershon (1989)
Transferring Power in the Family BusinessFamily Business Review, 7
M. Pinçon (1987)
Désarrois ouvriers : familles de métallurgistes dans les mutations industrielles et sociales
Isabelle Breton-Miller, David Miller (2008)
To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy and performance in family and lone founder firmsJournal of Strategy and Management, 1
E. Schein (1983)
The Role of the Founder in Creating Organizational CultureFamily Business Review, 8
Karen Vinton (1998)
Nepotism: An Interdisciplinary ModelFamily Business Review, 11
Sabine Klein, J. Astrachan, K. Smyrnios (2005)
The F–PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for TheoryEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
Danny Miller, Isabelle Breton-Miller (2005)
Managing For The Long Run: Lessons In Competitive Advantage From Great Family Businesses
M. Vries, Randel Carlock, Elizabeth Florent-Treacy (2007)
Family Business on the Couch: A Psychological Perspective
M.F.R. Kets de Vries
Les Mystères du leadership
Luis Cisneros, Émilie Genin (2010)
A Tridimensional Model to Analyze Management Style of Small Family Business Founders
R. Sorenson (2000)
The Contribution of Leadership Style and Practices to Family and Business SuccessFamily Business Review, 13
M.R.N. Lussier, C. Sonfield
Founder influence in family businesses: analyzing combined data for six diverse countries
J.A. Malarewicz
Affaires de familles, comment les entreprises familiales gèrent leur mutation et leur succession
Johan Lambrecht (2005)
Multigenerational Transition in Family Businesses: A New Explanatory ModelFamily Business Review, 18
H. Mintzberg
Le Management: Voyage au Centre des Organisations
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity EnvironmentsAcademy of Management Journal, 32
Gavin Cassar (2007)
Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growthEntrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19
C. Medlin (2007)
Case Study Research
J.W. Creswell
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
R. Donckels, E. Fröhlich (1991)
Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOSFamily Business Review, 4
A. Behrens (2010)
Charisma, paternalism, and business leadership in Latin AmericaThunderbird International Business Review, 52
Y. Evrard, B. Pras, E. Roux
Market: E´tudes et recherches en marketing. Fondements et Méthodes
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how small family business (SFB) leader‐founders exhibit a dominant logic of action over less dominant prevailing ones. The authors investigate three logics of action: family, power and economic. Design/methodology/approach – An exploratory qualitative research is conducted based on case studies. The authors use Cisneros and Genin's conceptual model, to identify, through an iterative sampling frame, three extreme SFB cases where in the first the leader exhibits a dominant family logic, in the second, a dominant power logic and in the third, a dominant economic logic. Findings – The authors illustrate the characteristics of the SFB leaders when they exhibit a dominant logic of action and also present some of the implications of SFB leaders’ dominant logics of action on the SFB and the family and non‐family members. Research limitations/implications – The three extreme case studies provide an important building block for future studies based on larger samples of SFBs. However, the authors’ results cannot be generalised due to the exploratory nature of the study. Practical implications – The paper highlights the importance, for practitioners and researchers alike, of being able to diagnose when SFB leaders use a dominant logic of action. The paper also accentuates the need for a greater awareness of logics of action in training programmes for SFB leaders and for consultants who work with those leaders. Originality/value – The concept of logics of action has never been previously empirically applied to large, medium or small family businesses. The paper highlights the relevance of identifying dominant logics of actions in SFB leaders.
Journal of Family Business Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 20, 2012
Keywords: Mexico; Family; Family firms; Leadership; Management styles; Management power; Small family business; Impact of family dynamics on management behaviours; Logic of action
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.