Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Agrawal, C. Knoeber (1996)
Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders, 31
R. V. Aguilera, G. Jackson (2003)
The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants, 28
R. Anderson, D. Reeb (2004)
Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms, 49
R. V. Aguilera (2005)
Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective, 16
R. V. Aguilera, A. Cuervo-Cazurra (2004)
Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger?, 25
R. V. Aguilera, R. V. Aguilera, M. Federowicz (2003)
Are Italy and Spain mediterranean sisters? A comparison of corporate governance systems
C. L. Ahmadjian, G. E. Robbins (2005)
A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan, 70
This paper develops an organizational approach to corporate governance and assesses the effectiveness of corporate governance and implications for policy. Most corporate governance research focuses on a universal link between corporate governance practices (e.g., board structure, shareholder activism) and performance outcomes, but neglects how interdependencies between the organization and diverse environments lead to variations in the effectiveness of different governance practices. In contrast to such closed systems approaches, we propose a framework based on open systems approaches to organizations, which examines these organizational interdependencies in terms of the costs, contingencies, and complementarities of different corporate governance practices. These three sets of organizational factors are useful in analyzing the effectiveness of corporate governance in diverse organizational environments. We also explore the impact of costs, contingencies, and complementarities on the effectiveness of different governance aspects through the use of stylized cases and discuss the implications for different approaches to policy such as soft law or hard law.
Organization Science – INFORMS
Published: Jun 1, 2008
Keywords: Keywords : corporate governance ; comparative corporate governance ; effectiveness ; organizational environments ; board independence ; information disclosure ; insider control ; institutional ; costs ; contingencies ; complementarities ; Germany ; Japan ; Italy ; France ; Russia ; United States ; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.