Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Bull (1944)
Adsorption of Water Vapor by Proteins1Journal of the American Chemical Society, 66
L. Richards (1941)
A PRESSURE‐MEMBRANE EXTRACTION APPARATUS FOR SOIL SOLUTIONSoil Science, 51
(1951)
Physical Biochemistrv, 2nd e(l
(1940)
Soil mnoistuire . id pla:it groAN-th in relation to pF
R. Reitemeier, L. Richards (1944)
RELIABILITY OF THE PRESSURE‐MEMBRANE METHOD FOR EXTRACTION OF SOIL SOLUTIONSoil Science, 57
(1957)
Sorption of water vapor on1 wheat floIIr, starch, anid gluten
J. Edsall (1952)
Physical biochemistry. 2nd ed: By Henry B. Bull, Professor of Chemistry, School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N. Y., 1951. viii + 355 pp. Price $5.75Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 39
E. Mellon, A. Korn, S. Hoover (1947)
Water absorption of proteins; the effect of free amino groups in casein.Journal of the American Chemical Society, 69 4
(1961)
Psyclhro - metric measurements of seil samples e ( uli ' ibrate ( d on pressure membranes
(1955)
Stress exerted by ws-ater held in wet webs of papermaking fibres
(1947)
Pressuire membrane apparatuis--ons ruction andiuse
Abstract The pressure membrane apparatus was used to study the matric potential (imbibition pressure or moisture tension) of plant tissues and of several organic colloidal preparations. The moisture release curves of aqueous 2% agar, 12% gelatin, and filter paper were smooth parabolic curves between matric potentials of −0.1 and −15 bars. When logarithms of the matric potentials were plotted against logarithms of the moisture content, the data yielded straight lines for agar and filter paper. Slices of fresh tissue lost little water after 2 days in the apparatus at maximum pressure of 15 bars. Osmotic forces in conjunction with cell membranes are able to retain moisture against pressure of this magnitude. After the cells were disrupted by freezing and thawing, up to 90% of the original moisture was removed by a 15 bar pressure, with lesser amounts removed at lower pressures. The results gave a parabolic relationship, and straight lines could be fitted to log—log plots of data from potato tuber and young asparagus stem slices. Sections from the tips of asparagus stems held less moisture at all matric potentials than more basal sections. The method permits the study of the matric potential of tissues independently of the osmotic potential. As measured, however, the matric potential is a composite of matric potentials of colloidal substances in the protoplasm and cell walls after disruption of cells by freezing and mixing of the contents. The value is therefore only an approximation of the matric potentials occurring in the living tissues. 1 This work was supported partly by a National Science Foundation Faculty Fellowship and was conducted at The Botanical Institute of the Agricultural University, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany. This content is only available as a PDF. © 1966 American Society of Plant Biologists This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
Plant Physiology – Oxford University Press
Published: Nov 1, 1966
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.