Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Morais, Luz Cary, J. Alegria, P. Bertelson (1979)
Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition, 7
M. Wolf, A. O'Rourke, Calvin Gidney, M. Lovett, P. Cirino, R. Morris (2002)
The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexiaReading and Writing, 15
Mark Seidenberg, M. Tanenhaus (1979)
Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5
Sarah White, E. Milne, S. Rosen, P. Hansen, J. Swettenham, U. Frith, F. Ramus (2006)
The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: a multiple case study of dyslexic children.Developmental science, 9 3
D. Bishop, R. Carlyon, J. Deeks, S. Bishop (1999)
Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 42 6
H. Wimmer, K. Landerl, Renate Linortner, P. Hummer (1991)
The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still importantCognition, 40
Why is translating print into meaning (or vice versa) so very difficult for some children? Researchers have been trying to answer this question for at least 80 years, and there is now widespread consensus that literacy problems go hand in hand with difficulties in analysing the speech segments of the ambient language – phonological awareness (PA). There is far less agreement, however, as to the origins of problems with PA. Some regard this as a core deficit specific to the processing of linguistic input. Others see the PA problems as secondary to lower‐level deficits in sensory processing. There are various versions of this type of theory, but most focus on problems in processing rapid, transient stimuli, with potential neurobiological origins in cerebellar and/or magnocellular systems. Into this arena come White, Milne, Rosen, Hansen, Swettenham, Frith and Ramus (this issue), with a study that aims to pit phonological explanations of dyslexia against what they term sensorimotor theories – i.e. those that postulate cerebellar or magnocellular origins of dyslexia, and so predict impairments of visual, auditory and/or motor function. Their study is a refreshing addition to the literature for two reasons: first, it focuses on individual variation in dyslexia, rather
Developmental Science – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.