Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Hicks, David Crouch (1990)
Can bibliometrics measure upPhysics World, 3
H. Kornberg (1991)
Science and Environmental Awareness.The School science review, 72
R. Driver, Hilary Asoko, J. Leach, P. Scott, E. Mortimer (1994)
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the ClassroomEducational Researcher, 23
E. Boyes, M. Stanisstreet (1994)
The ideas of secondary school children concerning ozone layer damageGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 4
E. Boyes, M. Stanisstreet (1993)
The ‘Greenhouse Effect’: children's perceptions of causes, consequences and curesInternational Journal of Science Education, 15
J. White, J. Houghton, G. Jenkins, J. Ephraums (1992)
Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Report Prepared for IPCC Working Group 1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeArctic and alpine research, 24
J. Hines, H. Hungerford, A. Tomera (1987)
Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education, 18
C. Tickell (1992)
The Quality of Life: What Quality? Whose Life?Environmental Values, 1
J. Solomon, P. Black, H. Stuart (1987)
The pupils’ view of electricity revisited: social development or cognitive growth?International Journal of Science Education, 9
Abstract This work sets out to quantify the dominant models that 13 and 14 year‐old children hold of the causes of the greenhouse effect and ozone layer depletion. In particular, it attempts to assess the prevalence of those ideas which, in the minds of some, link the two phenomena. It would seem that about twice as many children (around 80%) think that holes in the ozone layer cause the greenhouse effect than think the greenhouse effect causes ozone layer damage. The most common suggested connection (around 60% of children) appears to be that the holes in the ozone layer somehow allow more solar energy to arrive at the earth, no distinction being made between heat rays and ultra‐violet rays. Other, more bizarre, models, which assume global warming is a consequence of ozone depletion, seem to find at most 20% approval. Of those ideas which constitute a causal link in the opposite direction, the most common view appears to be that the greenhouse effect causes more smoke and pollution to rise, or causes it to rise to greater heights, and this damages the ozone layer. Other models are also identified and discussed.
Research in Science & Technological Education – Taylor & Francis
Published: May 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.