Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Parker (1979)
PHENOTYPIC CONSEQUENCES OF PARTHENOGENESIS IN CNEMIDOPHORUS LIZARDS. I. VARIABILITY IN PARTHENOGENETIC AND SEXUAL POPULATIONSEvolution, 33
M. Soulé, Suh‐Yung Yang, M. Weiler, G. Gorman (1973)
Biological Sciences: Island Lizards: the Genetic-Phenetic Variation CorrelationNature, 242
(1981)
Genie and morphological variability in central and marginal populations of Sigmodon hispidus In: Mammalian population genetics
B. Brewer, R. Lacy, M. Foster, G. Alaks (1990)
Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice.The Journal of heredity, 81 4
(1966)
A molecular approach to the study of genie heterozygosity in natural populations
T. Beacham, R. Withler (1985)
Heterozygosity and morphological variability of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from southern British Columbia and Puget SoundCanadian journal of genetics and cytology, 27
(1981)
Environmental and morphological correlates of genetic variation in mammals
L. Valen (1974)
Multivariate structural statistics in natural history.Journal of theoretical biology, 45 1
E. Zouros, D. Foltz (1987)
The use of allelic isozyme variation for the study of heterosis.Isozymes, 13
N. Yuhki, S. O’Brien (1990)
DNA variation of the mammalian major histocompatibility complex reflects genomic diversity and population history.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87 2
D. Andersen (1978)
Observations on Reproduction, Growth, and Behavior of the Northern Pocket Gopher (Thomomys talpoides)Journal of Mammalogy, 59
J. Patton, Suh‐Yung Yang (1977)
GENETIC VARIATION IN THOMOMYS BOTTAE POCKET GOPHERS: MACROGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNSEvolution, 31
R. Strauss (1991)
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN HETEROZYGOSITY AND PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY IN COTTUS (TELEOSTEI: COTTIDAE): CHARACTER COMPONENTSEvolution, 45
J. Patton, Juliana Feder (1981)
MICROSPATIAL GENETIC HETEROGENEITY IN POCKET GOPHERS: NON‐RANDOM BREEDING AND DRIFTEvolution, 35
(1981)
Morphological and biochemical variation and differentiation in insular and mainland deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus)
J. Patton, Margaret Smith (1990)
The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Pocket Gopher Thomomys bottæ, with Emphasis on California Populations
G. Lizana, J. Prado (1986)
Enzymatic heterozygosity and morphological variance in synthetic populations of Drosophila melanogasterGénétique, Sélection, Évolution, 18
M. Soulé (1972)
Phenetics of Natural Populations. III. Variation in Insular Populations of a LizardThe American Naturalist, 106
M. Lynch, T. Crease (1990)
The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation.Molecular biology and evolution, 7 4
A. Mitton, M. Grant (1984)
Associations Among Protein Heterozygosity, Growth Rate, and Developmental HomeostasisAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 15
G. Pogson, E. Zouros (1994)
Allozyme and RFLP heterozygosities as correlates of growth rate in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus: a test of the associative overdominance hypothesis.Genetics, 137 1
R. Kowal (1971)
296. Note: Disadvantages of the Generalized Variance as a Measure of VariabilityBiometrics, 27
S. Yezerinac, S. Lougheed, P. Handford (1992)
MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY AND ENZYME HETEROZYGOSITY: INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION LEVEL CORRELATIONSEvolution, 46
W. Rice (1989)
ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTSEvolution, 43
S. Loeb (1990)
REPRODUCTION AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF POCKET GOPHERS ( Thomomvs bottae ) FROM IRRIGATED ALFALFA FIELDS, 14
M. Soulé, S. Yang, M. Weiler, G. Gorman (1973)
Island lizards: the genetic-phenetic variation correlation.Nature, 242 5394
E. Santos, Harry Andreassen, R. Ims (1995)
Differential inbreeding tolerance in two geographically distinct strains of root voles Microtus oeconomusEcography, 18
Margaret Smith, J. Patton (1980)
Relationships of Pocket Gopher (Thomomys bottae) Populations of the Lower Colorado RiverJournal of Mammalogy, 61
M. Soulé (1979)
HETEROZYGOSITY AND DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY: ANOTHER LOOKEvolution, 33
R. Lewontin, J. Hubby (1966)
A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics, 54 2
J. Crow (1975)
The genetic basis of evolutionary changeAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 27
Robert Zink, Margaret Smith, James Patton (1985)
Associations between heterozygosity and morphological variance.The Journal of heredity, 76 6
Brendan McAndrew, Robert Ward, J. Beardmore (1982)
Lack of relationship between morphological variance and enzyme heterozygosity in the plaice, pleuronectes platessaHeredity, 48
R. Wayne, S. George, D. Gilbert, P. Collins, S. Kovach, D. Girman, N. Lehman (1991)
A MORPHOLOGIC AND GENETIC STUDY OF THE ISLAND FOX, UROCYON LITTORALISEvolution, 45
J. Patton, P. Brylski (1987)
Pocket Gophers in Alfalfa Fields: Causes and Consequences of Habitat-Related Body Size VariationThe American Naturalist, 130
M. Lynch (1991)
Analysis of population genetic structure by DNA fingerprinting.EXS, 58
(1982)
Secondary sexual size dimorphism in Thomomys bottae pocket gophers: maintenance and variation (PhD dissertation)
Joanne Daly, James Patton (1990)
DISPERSAL, GENE FLOW, AND ALLELIC DIVERSITY BETWEEN LOCAL POPULATIONS OF THOMOMYS BOTTAE POCKET GOPHERS IN THE COASTAL RANGES OF CALIFORNIAEvolution, 44
R. Chakraborty, N. Ryman (1983)
Relationship of mean and variance of genotypic values with heterozygosity per individual in a natural population.Genetics, 103 1
R. Strauss (1989)
Associations between genetic heterozygosity and morphological variability in freshwater sculpins, genus Cottus (Teleostei: Cottidae)Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 17
T. Dobzhansky (1955)
GENETIC HOMEOSTASISEvolution, 9
(1986)
Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals
M. Soulé (1982)
Allomeric Variation. 1. The Theory and Some ConsequencesThe American Naturalist, 120
M. Soulé, Suh‐Yung Yang (1973)
GENETIC VARIATION IN SIDE‐BLOTCHED LIZARDS ON ISLANDS IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIAEvolution, 27
R. Lewontin, Alexander Agassiz, Francisco Ayala, A. Beiles, George Carmody, Brian Charlesworth, Ian Franklin, Ove Frydenberg, Moto Kimura, Ken-Ichi Kojima, Terumi Mukai, Satya Prakash, Dick Richardson, Rollin Richmond, Tom Schopf, Robert Selander, Monte Slatkin, Tsuneyuki Yamazaki, Eleutherios
The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change
Abstract A comparison of electrophoretic and cranial (osteometric) variation in adult male and female pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae) confirms the existence of a genetic-phenetic variation correlation (GPVC)— a correlation of genetic variation and morphological variation over a set of natural populations. In males, characters correlated with body size give the highest GPVCs; in females, the characters with the highest GPVCs tend to be poorly correlated with body size. Genetic variation, as measured by variation in allozymes, explains up to half of the heterogeneity among populations in levels of morphological variation for some characters in females; in mates about 80% of the heterogeneity of phenotypic variation is explained by allozyme heterozygosity. There is no evidence for a correlation between individual heterozygosity and growth rate or body size for individuals within a population. The simplest way to explain these results is to assume that estimates of heterozygosity based on protein variation are correlated with the amount of additive genetic variation in populations. DNA fingerprint (heterogeneity of minisatellite regions) data from six populations are consistent with the electrophoretic and morphological results, although there is evidence that fingerprint heterogeneity in populations does not increase linearly with allozyme heterozygosity or morphological variability. This content is only available as a PDF. © Oxford University Press
Journal of Heredity – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.