Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Thermodynamic yield predictions for biodegradation through oxygenase activation reactions

Thermodynamic yield predictions for biodegradation through oxygenase activation reactions Biodegradation 12: 479–480, 2001. Corrigendum Thermodynamic yield predictions for biodegradation through oxygenase activation reactions Jeanne M. VanBriesen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Biodegradation 12(4): 265–281 (2001) There is a discrepancy between Tables 2 and 3 and One other point should also be corrected. As my Equations (18) and (20) in this paper. Equations (18) group has continued to work on EDTA biodegrada- and (20) show the mineralization of NTA and EDTA tion modeling, we sought to confirm the yield values 3− 4− as deprotonated anions (NTA and EDTA )and published by Henneken et al. (1995, 1998). Henneken provide computed G for this case. Tables 2 and et al. (1998) report a yield of 0.271 g CDW/g EDTA eD 3 provide calculations based on the stoichiometry of and a maintenance coefficient of 15.5 mg EDTA/g the protonated forms, H NTA and H EDTA. Since CDW-hour. In VanBriesen (2001), I assumed 0.271 g 3 4 the G values for NTA and EDTA given in Ap- CDW/g EDTA was the observed yield and used the pendix A are estimated following Mavrovouniotis maintenance costs and observed maximum cell growth (1991), a method that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biodegradation Springer Journals

Thermodynamic yield predictions for biodegradation through oxygenase activation reactions

VanBriesen, Jeanne
Biodegradation , Volume 12 (6) – Oct 19, 2004
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/thermodynamic-yield-predictions-for-biodegradation-through-oxygenase-7HYEP80jQn

References (6)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Environment; Geochemistry; Soil Science & Conservation; Terrestrial Pollution; Waste Management/Waste Technology; Waste Water Technology / Water Pollution Control / Water Management / Aquatic Pollution
ISSN
0923-9820
eISSN
1572-9729
DOI
10.1023/A:1015034105485
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Biodegradation 12: 479–480, 2001. Corrigendum Thermodynamic yield predictions for biodegradation through oxygenase activation reactions Jeanne M. VanBriesen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Biodegradation 12(4): 265–281 (2001) There is a discrepancy between Tables 2 and 3 and One other point should also be corrected. As my Equations (18) and (20) in this paper. Equations (18) group has continued to work on EDTA biodegrada- and (20) show the mineralization of NTA and EDTA tion modeling, we sought to confirm the yield values 3− 4− as deprotonated anions (NTA and EDTA )and published by Henneken et al. (1995, 1998). Henneken provide computed G for this case. Tables 2 and et al. (1998) report a yield of 0.271 g CDW/g EDTA eD 3 provide calculations based on the stoichiometry of and a maintenance coefficient of 15.5 mg EDTA/g the protonated forms, H NTA and H EDTA. Since CDW-hour. In VanBriesen (2001), I assumed 0.271 g 3 4 the G values for NTA and EDTA given in Ap- CDW/g EDTA was the observed yield and used the pendix A are estimated following Mavrovouniotis maintenance costs and observed maximum cell growth (1991), a method that

Journal

Biodegradation – Springer Journals

Published: Oct 19, 2004

There are no references for this article.