Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Testing linguistic minorities

Testing linguistic minorities Suggests that psychological and educational testing of members of linguistic minority groups should take into account the diverse social, political, and economic realities currently facing these groups. These realities are moderated by educational opportunities, which in turn are closely linked to various forms of standardized testing. Key conceptual and operational issues underlying concern about this situation are described. Conceptual issues include bilingualism, acculturation, and the "emic–etic" distinction, particularly as the latter applies to the cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive constructs. Operational issues include assessment of language dominance, test translation and development, and the examiner variable. The author appeals for concern with and sensitivity to individual differences in sociocultural and linguistic characteristics. (40 ref) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Psychologist American Psychological Association

Testing linguistic minorities

American Psychologist , Volume 36 (10): 8 – Oct 1, 1981

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/testing-linguistic-minorities-70DQbaBQVp

References (26)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0003-066x
eISSN
1935-990X
DOI
10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1078
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Suggests that psychological and educational testing of members of linguistic minority groups should take into account the diverse social, political, and economic realities currently facing these groups. These realities are moderated by educational opportunities, which in turn are closely linked to various forms of standardized testing. Key conceptual and operational issues underlying concern about this situation are described. Conceptual issues include bilingualism, acculturation, and the "emic–etic" distinction, particularly as the latter applies to the cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive constructs. Operational issues include assessment of language dominance, test translation and development, and the examiner variable. The author appeals for concern with and sensitivity to individual differences in sociocultural and linguistic characteristics. (40 ref)

Journal

American PsychologistAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Oct 1, 1981

There are no references for this article.