Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Nisbett, Henry Zukier, Ronald Lemley (1981)
The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic informationCognitive Psychology, 13
H. Montgomery (1989)
From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making.
G. Gaeth, I. Levin, G. Chakraborty, Aron Levin (1991)
Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysisMarketing Letters, 2
Ziva Kunda (1990)
The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological bulletin, 108 3
A. Tversky (1977)
Features of SimilarityPsychological Review, 84
A. Tversky, J. Russo (1969)
Substitutability and similarity in binary choicesJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 6
B. Mellers, Karen Biagini (1994)
Similarity and Choice.Psychological Review, 101
J. Payne (1976)
Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16
A. Tversky, Shmuel Sattath, P. Slovic (1988)
Contingent weighting in judgment and choicePsychological Review, 95
J. Russo, V. Medvec, Margaret Meloy (1996)
The Distortion of Information during DecisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66
W. Goldstein (1990)
Judgments of relative importance in decision making: Global vs local interpretations of subjective weightOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47
A. Tversky (1972)
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice.Psychological Review, 79
Gregory Carpenter, Kent Nakamoto (1989)
Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering AdvantageJournal of Marketing Research, 26
J. Payne, J. Bettman, Eric Johnson (1993)
The adaptive decision maker: Name index
J. Payne, M. Braunstein (1971)
Preferences among gambles with equal underlying distributionsJournal of Experimental Psychology, 87
R. Meyer, T. Eagle (1982)
Context-Induced Parameter Instability in a Disaggregate-Stochastic Model of Store ChoiceJournal of Marketing Research, 19
In this article, the effect of common features on brand choice and the moderating role of attribute importance are examined. It is argued that when brand attributes differ in importance, common features are likely to enhance consumer preferences for the option with the best value on the most important attribute, thus further polarizing brands' choice shares. In contrast, when attributes are similar in their importance, common features are likely to have an opposite effect, equalizing brands' shares. The data provide support for these propositions.
Journal of Consumer Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.