Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1989)
Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures.Multivariate behavioral research, 24 4
B. Thompson (2000)
Ten commandments of structural equation modeling.
(2006)
Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Validation of an abridged instrument
Anna Costello, J. Osborne (2005)
Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis.Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10
R. Hoyle (1995)
The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues.
R. Hoyle, Jamieson Duvall (2004)
Determining the Number of Factors in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
C. Chou, P. Bentler (1995)
Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling.
Gavin Brown (2004)
Teachers' conceptions of assessment: implications for policy and professional developmentAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1992)
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 21
(2003)
AMOS (Version 5)
L. Grimm, P. Yarnold (2000)
Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics.
B. Byrne (2000)
Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming
R. Maccallum (1995)
Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues.
(2006)
Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Validation of an abridged
Gavin Brown (2004)
Measuring Attitude with Positively Packed Self-Report Ratings: Comparison of Agreement and Frequency ScalesPsychological Reports, 94
Department of Education and the Arts
R. Gable, M. Wolf (1993)
Instrument Development in the Affective Domain: Measuring Attitudes and Values in Corporate and School Settings
M. Smith (1996)
Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and ApplicationsThe Statistician, 45
(2004)
Determinin the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
(2004)
Determinin the number of factors in exploratory and
(2003)
AMOS (Version 5). Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corp. [computer software
(2003)
AMOS (Version 5) [Computer software
Psychometric characteristics of the abridged Teachers' Conceptions of Assessment-III are reported. Data are from a study of 525 New Zealand primary school teachers and from a second study of 692 Queensland primary school teachers. The abridged version of 27 statements using a positively packed response scale had good fit characteristics for primary teachers in both New Zealand (χ3112 = 841.02; RMSEA = .057; TLI = .87) and Queensland (χ3112 = 1492.61; RMSEA = .074; TLI = .80). While providing information of similar quality to that of the original the abridged version is more efficient than the full scale.
Psychological Reports – SAGE
Published: Aug 31, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.