Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Zahl (1989)
Line Transect Sampling with Unknown Probability of Detection Along the TransectBiometrics, 45
K. Pollock (1978)
A Family of Density Estimators for Line-Transect SamplingBiometrics, 34
D. Rasch (1974)
Seber, G.A.F.: The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Griffin, London 1973, 1. Aufl. XII, 506 S., 34 Abb., 116 Tab., £ 12,—Biometrische Zeitschrift, 16
J.G. Cooke (1985)
Notes on the estimation of whale density from line transectsReport of the International Whaling Commission, 35
B. Efron (1987)
The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans
D. Chapman (1951)
Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoölogical somple censuses
K. Pollock, W. Kendall (1987)
Visibility bias in aerial surveys a review of estimation proceduresJournal of Wildlife Management, 51
S.T. Buckland (1986)
Estimating Minke whale density — a suggested procedureReport of the International Whaling Commission, 36
S. Buckland, B. Turnock (1992)
A robust line transect methodBiometrics, 48
S.T. Buckland, B.J. Turnock (1992)
A robust line transect modelBiometrics, 48
P.B. Best, D.S. Butterworth (1980)
Report of the Southern Hemisphere Minke whale assessment cruise, 1978/79Report of the International Whaling Commission, 30
S.T. Buckland (1992)
Fitting density functions using polynomialsApplied Statistics, 41
G. White (1983)
Numerical estimation of survival rates from band-recovery and biotelemetry dataJournal of Wildlife Management, 47
J.L. Laake (1978)
MS Thesis
Eric Renshaw, G. White, David Anderson, K. Burnham, D. Otis (1983)
Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed PopulationsJournal of Wildlife Management, 48
J.L. Laake, S.T. Buckland, D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham (1993)
DISTANCE User's Guide
D. Anderson, R. Pospahala (1970)
Correction of bias in belt transect studies of immotile objectsJournal of Wildlife Management, 34
S. Buckland, David Anderson, K. Burnham, J. Laake (1993)
Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations.
H. Akaike (1973)
International Symposium on Information Theory
T. Drummer, L. McDonald (1987)
Size Bias in Line Transect SamplingBiometrics, 43
T. Schweder, G. Høst, N. Øien (1991)
Estimates of the detection probability for shipboard surveys of Northeastern Atlantic Minke whales, based on a parallel ship experimentReport of the International Whaling Commission, 41
S. Buckland, K. Burnham, David Anderson, J. Lake (1981)
Wildlife Monographs: Estimation of Density from Line Transect Sampling of Biological PopulationsJournal of Animal Ecology, 50
S.T. Buckland (1992)
Effects of heterogeneity on estimation of probability of detection on the tracklineReport of the International Whaling Commission, 42
M. Otto, K. Pollock (1990)
Size Bias in Line Transect Sampling: A Field TestBiometrics, 46
G. Seber (1974)
The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters
S.T. Buckland (1987)
Estimation of Minke whale numbers from the 1984/85 IWC/IDCR Antarctic sightings dataReport of the International Whaling Commission, 37
D.S. Butterworth, P.B. Best, M. Basson (1982)
Results of analysis of Minke whale assessment cruise, 1980/81Report of the International Whaling Commission, 32
D.S. Butterworth, P.B. Best, D. Hembree (1984)
Analysis of experiments carried out during the 1981/82 IWC/IDCR. Minke whale assessment cruise in Area 11Report of the International Whaling Commission, 34
T. Quinn (1985)
Line transect estimators for schooling populationsFisheries Research, 3
L. Low, B. Efron (1983)
The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78
T. Schweder, G. Høst, N. Øien (1991)
A note on the bias in capture-recapture type estimates of g(0) due to the fact that whales are divingReport of the International Whaling Commission, 41
A. Lawson, K. Pollock, J. Nichols, C. Brownie, J. Hines (1992)
Statistical inference for capture-recapture experimentsBiometrics, 107
D.S. Butterworth, D.L. Borchers (1988)
Estimates of g(0) for Minke schools from the results of the independent observer experiment on the 1985/86 and 1986/87 IWC/IDCR Antarctic assessment cruisesReport of the International Whaling Commission, 38
J. Laake, K. Burnham, David Anderson (1981)
Line transect estimation of bird population density using a Fourier seriesStudies in avian biology, 6
S. Buckland (1992)
Fitting Density Functions with PolynomialsApplied statistics, 41
T. Schweder (1990)
Independent observer experiments to estimate the detection function in line transect surveys of whalesReport of the International Whaling Commission, 40
N. Øien (1990)
Estimates of g(0) for Minke whales based on an independent observer experiment during the Norwegian sightings surveys in July 1988Report of the International Whaling Commission, 40
P. Quang, R. Lanctot (1991)
A line transect model for aerial surveysBiometrics, 47
K. Burnham, David Anderson, J. Laake (1979)
Robust estimation from line transect dataJournal of Wildlife Management, 43
J. Horwood, P. Best, S. Ohsumi (1980)
International Whaling Commission/International Decade of Cetacean Research (IWC/IDCR) Southern Minke Whale assessment cruise, 1978–79Polar Record, 20
B. Manly, L. McDonald, G. Garner (1996)
Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Double-Count Method With Independent ObserversJournal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 1
We present a robust sampling methodology to estimate population size using line transect and capture-recapture procedures for aerial surveys. Aerial surveys usually underestimate population density due to animals being missed. A combination of capture-recapture and line transect sampling methods with multiple observers allows violation of the assumption that all animals on the centreline are sighted from the air. We illustrate our method with an example of inanimate objects which shows evidence of failure of the assumption that all objects on the centreline have probability 1 of being detected. A simulation study is implemented to evaluate the performance of three variations of the Lincoln-Petersen estimator: the overall estimator, the stratified estimator, and the general stratified estimator based on the combined likelihood proposed in this paper. The stratified Lincoln-Petersen estimator based on the combined likelihood is found to be generally superior to the other estimators.
Environmental and Ecological Statistics – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 12, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.