Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kenyon, A. Thomas, D. Goodwin (1972)
Heparin protection for the brain during carotid-artery reconstruction.Lancet, 2 7769
A. Callow, G. Matsumoto, D. Baker, D. Cossman, W. Watson (1978)
Protection of the high risk carotid endarterectomy patient by continuous electroencephalography.The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, 19 1
J. R. Kenyon, A. B. W. Thomas, D. P. Goodwin (1972)
Heparin protection for the brain during carotid artery surgery, ii
R. Green, W. Messick, J. Ricotta, M. Charlton, R. Satran, M. McBride, J. Deweese (1985)
Benefits, Shortcomings, and Costs of EEG MonitoringAnnals of Surgery, 201
J. Connolly, J. Kwaan, E. Stemmer (1977)
Improved Results with Carotid EndarterectomyAnnals of Surgery, 186
J. E. Thompson, C. M. Talkington (1976)
Carotid endarterectomy, surgical progress, 184
N. Hertzer, E. Beven, R. Greenstreet, A. Humphries (1978)
Internal carotid back pressure, intraoperative shunting, ulcerated atheromata, and the incidence of stroke during carotid endarterectomy.Surgery, 83 3
T. Sundt, F. Sharbrough, D. Piepgras, T. Kearns, J. Messick, W. O'Fallon (1981)
Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy: with results of surgery and hemodynamics of cerebral ischemia.Mayo Clinic proceedings, 56 9
K. Chiappa, S. Burke, R. Young (1979)
Results of Electroencephalographic Monitoring During 367 Carotid Endarterectomies Use of a Dedicated MinicomputerStroke, 10
W. Trojaborg, G. Boysen (1973)
Relation between EEG, regional cerebral blood flow and internal carotid artery pressure during carotid endarterectomy.Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 34 1
T. Sundt, Houser Ow, F. Sharbrough, Joseph Messick (1977)
Carotid endarterectomy: results, complications, and monitoring techniques.Advances in neurology, 16
H. Javid, O. C. Jullan, W. S. Dye (1979)
Seventeen‐year experience with routine shunting in carotid surgery, 3
J. E. Thompson (1979)
Complications of carotid endarterectomy and their prevention, 3
W. S. Moore, J. M. Yee, A. D. Hall (1973)
Collateral cerebral blood pressure, 106
G. Ferguson (1982)
Intra‐operative monitoring and internal shunts: are they necessary in carotid endarterectomy?Stroke, 13
J. D. Baker, B. Gluecklich, C. W. Watson, E. Marcus, V. Kamat, A. D. Callow (1975)
An evaluation of electroencephalographic monitoring for carotid surgery, 78
K. H. Chiappa, S. R. Burke, R. R. Young (1979)
Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 367 carotid endarterectomies, 10
L. R. Caplan (1976)
Lacunar infarction: a neglected concept, 31
W. Moore, J. Yee, A. Hall (1973)
Collateral cerebral blood pressure. An index of tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion.Archives of Surgery, 106
R. Lord, A. Graham (1986)
The validity of internal carotid back pressure measurements during carotid endarterectomy for unilateral carotid stenosis.The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery, 56 6
A. Graham, B. Gewertz, C. Zarins (1986)
Predicting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.Archives of surgery, 121 5
T. Sundt, F. Sharbrough, R. Anderson, J. Michenfelder (1975)
Cerebral blood flow measurements and electroencephalograms during carotid endarterectomy.Journal of neurosurgery, 41 3
R. J. Hayes, S. A. Levinson, E. G. Wylle (1972)
Intraoperative measurement of carotid back pressure as a puide to ooerative manaeement for carotid endarterectomy, 12
One hundred and thirty‐one patients undergoing 142 carotid endarterectomy procedures were randomized to have their operation performed either with or without intra‐operative electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. Patients with EEG monitoring were shunted if both the internal carotid back pressure (ICBP) was less than 50 mmHg and ipsilateral change was evident on the EEG after clamping. Patients without EEG monitoring were shunted if ICBP was less than 50 mmHg. There was one postoperative death (0.7%) with neurological deficits occurring in five patients (3.5%). There were significantly fewer neurological deficits (P = 0.02) in patients with no EEG change (one of 59) compared with those with EEG change (two of 13). There was a highly significant increase (P = 0.005) in incidence of neurological deficit (two of five patients) when ICBP was considered ‘adequate’ at 50 mmHg or greater but EEG change occurred. No neurological deficit occurred in 14 patients who were not shunted with ICBP < 50 mmHg but with no EEG change. There was no difference in the incidence of neurological deficit in patients with low and high ICBP when both 50 and 55 mmHg were used as the cut‐off points. It is concluded that EEG monitoring is useful in identifying patients requiring shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Use of a shunt is recommended if there is EEG change regardless of ICBP; conversely, if ICBP is low but there is no EEG change it would appear safe to proceed without shunting.
Anz Journal of Surgery – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1988
Keywords: ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.