Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Craib, M. Archer (1997)
Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic ApproachCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 22
G. Steinmetz (2004)
Critical Realism: The Difference That It MakesContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 33
H. Kunkel (1971)
GENERAL INTRODUCTIONThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 134
Masuhiro Kogoma (2006)
総論;総論;IntroductionThe journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 126
Address: Department of Political Science and International Studies
J. Cruickshank (2003)
Critical realism : the difference it makes
M. Archer (2000)
For Structure: Its Reality, Properties and Powers: A Reply to Anthony KingThe Sociological Review, 48
Andrew Collier (1994)
Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy
R. Stones (2001)
Refusing the Realism—Structuration DivideEuropean Journal of Social Theory, 4
J. Lovering (1989)
Reclaiming RealityCapital & Class, 13
E. Shils (1982)
The Constitution Of Society
M. Archer (2000)
Being Human: The Problem of Agency
B. Adam (1990)
Time and Social Theory
(1983)
Evolution and Zeitlichkeit
A. King (1999)
Against Structure: A Critique of Morphogenetic Social TheoryThe Sociological Review, 47
(1994)
Plato etc
Change is central to critical realism yet there has been little theoretical explication on the temporal dimension. It is shown that this oversight results in Archer's morphogenetic approach employing an ontological dualism of cyclical and linear temporalities similar to that contained within Giddens’ structuration theory. Consequently, neither Archer nor Giddens is able to explain change and the transition between different epochs in a persuasive manner. In order to minimize these problems, Adam's concept of circadiantime is adopted.This allows for a diachronic analysis that synchronically incorporates both continuity and change. Accordingly, it is able to transcend the temporal dualism of repetition and transformation.This temporal conceptualization is then incorporated within a critical realist framework. It is suggested that employing a double helix analogy allows for the integration of the notion of a stratified social ontology with a non-dichotomous temporal conceptualization.
Sociology – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.