Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Horn, P. Wolf, H. Wulf, T. Warloe, C. Fritsch, L. Rhodes, R. Kaufmann, M. Rie, F. Legat, I. Stender, A. Soler, A. Wennberg, G. Wong, O. Larkö (2003)
Topical methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy in patients with basal cell carcinoma prone to complications and poor cosmetic outcome with conventional treatmentBritish Journal of Dermatology, 149
S. Wiegell, M. Haedersdal, P. Eriksen, H. Wulf (2009)
Photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with 8% and 16% methyl aminolaevulinate and home‐based daylight exposure: a double‐blinded randomized clinical trialBritish Journal of Dermatology, 160
Telfer (2008)
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinomaBr J Dermatol, 159
S. Grapengiesser, F. Gudmundsson, O. Larkö, M. Ericson, Arne Rosén, A. Wennberg (2002)
Pain caused by photodynamic therapy of skin cancerClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 27
J. Heydenreich, H. Wulf (2005)
Miniature Personal Electronic UVR Dosimeter with Erythema Response and Time-stamped Readings in a Wristwatch, 81
L. Rhodes, M. Rie, Y. Enström, R. Groves, T. Morken, V. Goulden, G. Wong, J. Grob, S. Varma, P. Wolf (2004)
Photodynamic therapy using topical methyl aminolevulinate vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma: results of a multicenter randomized prospective trial.Archives of dermatology, 140 1
S. Wiegell, S. Fabricius, M. Gniadecka, I. Stender, B. Berne, S. Kroon, B. Andersen, C. Mork, C. Sandberg, K. Ibler, G. Jemec, K. Brocks, P. Philipsen, J. Heydenreich, M. Haedersdal, H. Wulf (2012)
Daylight‐mediated photodynamic therapy of moderate to thick actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: a randomized multicentre studyBritish Journal of Dermatology, 166
W. Sterry (2006)
Guidelines: the management of basal cell carcinoma.European journal of dermatology : EJD, 16 5
S. Wiegell, S. Fabricius, J. Heydenreich, C. Enk, S. Rosso, W. Bäumler, B. Baldursson, H. Wulf (2013)
Weather conditions and daylight‐mediated photodynamic therapy: protoporphyrin IX‐weighted daylight doses measured in six geographical locationsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 168
N. Basset-Seguin, S. Ibbotson, L. Emtestam, M. Tarstedt, C. Morton, M. Maroti, P. Calzavara-Pinton, S. Varma, R. Roelandts, P. Wolf (2008)
Topical methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy versus cryotherapy for superficial basal cell carcinoma: a 5 year randomized trial.European journal of dermatology : EJD, 18 5
R. Szeimies, S. Ibbotson, D. Murrell, D. Rubel, Y. Frambach, D. Berker, R. Dummer, N. Kerrouche, H. Villemagne (2008)
A clinical study comparing methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy and surgery in small superficial basal cell carcinoma (8–20 mm), with a 12‐month follow‐up.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 22
I. Wang, N. Bendsøe, C. Klinteberg, A. Enejder, S. Andersson-Engels, S. Svanberg, K. Svanberg (2001)
Photodynamic therapy vs. cryosurgery of basal cell carcinomas: results of a phase III clinical trialBritish Journal of Dermatology, 144
S. Wiegell, H. Wulf, R. Szeimies, N. Basset-Seguin, R. Bissonnette, M. Gerritsen, Y. Gilaberte, P. Calzavara-Pinton, C. Morton, A. Sidoroff, Lasse Braathen (2012)
Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: an international consensusJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 26
S. Wiegell, S. Fabricius, I. Stender, B. Berne, S. Kroon, B. Andersen, C. Mork, C. Sandberg, G. Jemec, M. Mogensen, K. Brocks, P. Philipsen, J. Heydenreich, M. Haedersdal, H. Wulf (2011)
A randomized, multicentre study of directed daylight exposure times of 1½ vs. 2½ h in daylight‐mediated photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in patients with multiple thin actinic keratoses of the face and scalpBritish Journal of Dermatology, 164
S. Wiegell, M. Haedersdal, P. Philipsen, P. Eriksen, C. Enk, H. Wulf (2008)
Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single‐blinded studyBritish Journal of Dermatology, 158
J. Roewert-Huber, B. Lange‐Asschenfeldt, E. Stockfleth, H. Kerl (2007)
Epidemiology and aetiology of basal cell carcinomaBritish Journal of Dermatology, 157
E. Angell‐Petersen, Roar Sørensen, T. Warloe, A. Soler, J. Moan, Q. Peng, K. Giercksky (2006)
Porphyrin formation in actinic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma after topical application of methyl 5-aminolevulinate.The Journal of investigative dermatology, 126 2
James Kennedy, R. Pottier (1992)
Endogenous protoporphyrin IX, a clinically useful photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy.Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology, 14 4
G. Martin (2012)
A randomized, multicentre study of directed daylight exposure times of 1½ vs. 2½h in daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in patients with multiple thin actinic keratoses of the face and scalpYearbook of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, 2012
Background Studies have shown that daylight‐photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment of actinic keratoses, nearly pain free and more convenient for both the clinics and patients. Treatment of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) is another main indication for PDT. Objectives The aim of this open, uncontrolled, prospective explorative study was to evaluate the efficacy of daylight‐PDT for BCCs. Methods Twenty‐one patients with a total of 32 BCCs located in the face, scalp, chest, back and lower leg received one cycle of daylight‐methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)‐PDT, consisting of two treatments 1 week apart. After sunscreen application and lesion preparation, MAL was applied and patients exposed themselves to daylight for 2½ h. Daylight exposure was monitored with a wrist‐borne dosimeter. Results At 3‐month follow‐up, complete response was seen in 30 lesions (94%) and in 19 patients (90%). At 12‐month follow‐up, six lesions had recurred resulting in a total recurrence rate of 21% (6/29) as one lesion was lost to follow‐up. Twelve months after daylight‐PDT, 74% (23/31) of the treated lesions showed complete response. During each treatment, the mean effective light dose was 10.8 J/cm2 during an average of 152 min of daylight exposure. Treatment was pain free with good or excellent cosmesis. Conclusions In conclusion, daylight‐PDT proved to be as effective as conventional PDT in the treatment of BCCs in this explorative clinical study. Daylight‐PDT was pain free and more convenient for both clinicians and patients. The cosmetic outcome was good or excellent. Larger studies need to confirm the findings of this study.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.