Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Snyder, K. Smith, E. Bantug, Elliott Tolbert, A. Blackford, M. Brundage (2017)
What do these scores mean? Presenting patient‐reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretabilityCancer, 123
L. Wagner, J. Schink, Michael Bass, Shalin Patel, M. Diaz, N. Rothrock, T. Pearman, R. Gershon, F. Penedo, S. Rosen, D. Cella (2015)
Bringing PROMIS to practice: Brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer careCancer, 121
Doris Howell, Sean Molloy, K. Wilkinson, Esther Green, K. Orchard, K. Wang, J. Liberty (2015)
Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 26 9
G. Cizek (1993)
Reconsidering Standards and CriteriaJournal of Educational Measurement, 30
K. Cook, David Victorson, D. Cella, B. Schalet, Deborah Miller (2014)
Creating meaningful cut-scores for Neuro-QOL measures of fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep disturbance using standard setting with patients and providersQuality of Life Research, 24
Martin Seneviratne, S. Bozkurt, Manali Patel, Tina Seto, J. Brooks, D. Blayney, A. Kurian, T. Hernandez-Boussard (2018)
Distribution of global health measures from routinely collected PROMIS surveys in patients with breast cancer or prostate cancerCancer, 125
V. Nagaraja, C. Mara, P. Khanna, R. Namas, A. Young, D. Fox, T. Laing, W. Mccune, Carole Dodge, D. Rizzo, Maha Almackenzie, D. Khanna (2018)
Establishing clinical severity for PROMIS® measures in adult patients with rheumatic diseasesQuality of Life Research, 27
M. Rose, J. Bjorner, B. Gandek, B. Bruce, J. Fries, J. Ware (2014)
The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 67 5
E. Morgan, C. Mara, Bin Huang, K. Barnett, A. Carle, J. Farrell, K. Cook (2017)
Establishing clinical meaning and defining important differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis using standard setting with patients, parents, and providersQuality of Life Research, 26
B. Given, C. Given, A. Sikorskii, S. Jeon, R. McCorkle, V. Champion, D. Decker (2008)
Establishing mild, moderate, and severe scores for cancer-related symptoms: how consistent and clinically meaningful are interference-based severity cut-points?Journal of pain and symptom management, 35 2
(2008)
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
B. Reeve, R. Hays, J. Bjorner, K. Cook, P. Crane, J. Teresi, D. Thissen, D. Revicki, D. Weiss, R. Hambleton, Honghu Liu, R. Gershon, S. Reise, J. Lai, D. Cella (2007)
Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Medical Care, 45
Jack Chen, L. Ou, S. Hollis (2013)
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic settingBMC Health Services Research, 13
K. Lohr, N. Aaronson, J. Alonso, M. Burnam, D. Patrick, E. Perrin, James Roberts (1996)
Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria.Clinical therapeutics, 18 5
Daniel Buysse, Lan Yu, D. Moul, A. Germain, A. Stover, Nathan Dodds, Kelly Johnston, Melissa Shablesky-Cade, P. Pilkonis (2010)
Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments.Sleep, 33 6
J. Lai, L. Wagner, P. Jacobsen, D. Cella (2014)
Self‐reported cognitive concerns and abilities: two sides of one coin?Psycho‐Oncology, 23
C. Coon, K. Cook (2017)
Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scoresQuality of Life Research, 27
M. Rose, J. Bjorner, J. Becker, J. Fries, J. Ware (2008)
Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).Journal of clinical epidemiology, 61 1
(2005)
Angoff and Bookmark methods
E. Basch, B. Reeve, S. Mitchell, S. Clauser, L. Minasian, A. Dueck, T. Mendoza, J. Hay, T. Atkinson, A. Abernethy, D. Bruner, C. Cleeland, J. Sloan, Ram Chilukuri, Paul Baumgartner, A. Denicoff, D. Germain, A. O'Mara, Alice Chen, J. Kelaghan, A. Bennett, L. Sit, L. Rogak, A. Barz, D. Paul, D. Schrag (2014)
Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106 9
J. Cappelleri, A. Bushmakin (2014)
Interpretation of patient-reported outcomesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 23
D. Cella, Seung Choi, S. Garcia, K. Cook, Sarah Rosenbloom, J. Lai, D. Tatum, R. Gershon (2014)
Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgmentQuality of Life Research, 23
D. Cella, William Riley, A. Stone, N. Rothrock, B. Reeve, S. Yount, D. Amtmann, R. Bode, Daniel Buysse, Seung Choi, K. Cook, R. Devellis, D. DeWalt, J. Fries, R. Gershon, E. Hahn, J. Lai, P. Pilkonis, D. Revicki, M. Rose, K. Weinfurt, R. Hays (2010)
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 63 11
K. Cook, D. Cella, B. Reeve (2019)
PRO-Bookmarking to Estimate Clinical Thresholds for Patient-reported Symptoms and Function.Medical Care
G. Palos, T. Mendoza, G. Mobley, S. Cantor, C. Cleeland (2006)
Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain.The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society, 7 1
® ® Purpose Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Sy stem (PROMIS ) physical function, cognitive function, and sleep disturbance measures are increasingly used in cancer care. However, there is limited guidance for interpreting the clinical meaning of scores. This study aimed to apply bookmarking, a standard setting methodology, to identify PROMIS score thresholds in the context of cancer care. Methods Using item parameters, we constructed vignettes of five items covering the range of possible scores. Focus groups were held with cancer care providers and people with cancer. Terminology for categorizing levels of severity was explored. Participants rank ordered vignettes by severity and then placed bookmarks between vignettes representing different levels of severity. Group discussion was held until consensus on bookmark placement was reached. Results Clinicians selected “within normal limits,” “mild,” “moderate,” and “severe” to describe levels of severity. Both patients and clinicians were able to apply these labels, but there was not unanimous support for any set of descriptors. Clini- cians and patients agreed on all severity thresholds for sleep disturbance. For cognitive and physical function, clinicians and patients agreed on the threshold between “within normal limits” and “mild.” However, patients required greater dysfunction than clinicians before applying “moderate” and
Quality of Life Research – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 13, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.