Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Conducted 3 studies that sought (a) to demonstrate the influence of associations to past experience and generic knowledge on judgments and decisions and (b) to point out the potential for misapplying such associations. In the 1st 2 studies, 14 sportswriters and 18 college football coaches were asked to rate hypothetical college football players. Descriptions of these players containing irrelevant comparisons with current professionals playing the same positions were rated higher than descriptions which did not contain these comparisons. The 3rd study demonstrated this same phenomenon in a foreign policy domain: The recommendations of 42 political science undergraduates for resolving a hypothetical international crisis were influenced by irrelevant similarities between the hypothetical crisis and various historical analogies. The relationship between these studies and recent work on knowledge structures, such as schemata, is discussed. (16 ref)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: May 1, 1981
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.