Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/research-on-the-impact-evaluation-of-academic-journals-based-on-2bNsAGgmdC
References (27)
-
N. Kaplan, R. Merton, N. Storer (1975)
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical InvestigationsJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14
-
R. Werner (2015)
The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less usefulNature, 517
-
R. Merton (1988)
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual PropertyIsis, 79
-
L. Bornmann (2014)
Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetricsJ. Informetrics, 8
-
M. Thelwall (2017)
Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 69
-
Liwei Zhang, Jue Wang (2018)
Why highly cited articles are not highly tweeted? A biology caseScientometrics, 117
-
M. Thelwall, Tamara Nevill (2018)
Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?J. Informetrics, 12
-
Nabeil Maflahi, M. Thelwall (2018)
How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articlesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69
-
E. Garfield (2006)
Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.Science, 122 3159
-
W. Glänzel, J. Gorraiz (2015)
Usage metrics versus altmetrics: confusing terminology?Scientometrics, 102
-
E. Garf (1970)
Citation Indexing for Studying ScienceNature, 227
-
L. Bornmann, R. Haunschild (2016)
How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter IndexScientometrics, 107
-
H. Moed, Gali Halevi (2014)
Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impactJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
-
Pardeep Sud, M. Thelwall (2014)
Evaluating altmetricsScientometrics, 98
-
(2018)
Altmetrics at institutional level: Visibility on the web of the scientific production of Spanish universities from Altmetric.com. Profesional De La Informacion -
L. Waltman (2015)
A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorsJ. Informetrics, 10
-
Houqiang Yu (2017)
Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user categoryScientometrics, 111
-
R. Costas, Zohreh Zahedi, P. Wouters (2014)
Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspectiveJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
-
Cassidy Sugimoto, Sam Work, V. Larivière, S. Haustein (2016)
Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literatureJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68
-
J. Ortega (2017)
The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations)Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 69
-
Siluo Yang, Xin Xing, D. Wolfram (2018)
Difference in the impact of open-access papers published by China and the USAScientometrics, 115
-
Kai Li, J. Rollins, E. Yan (2017)
Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysisScientometrics, 115
-
M. Thelwall, S. Haustein, V. Larivière, Cassidy Sugimoto (2013)
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web ServicesPLoS ONE, 8
-
M. Thelwall, Paul Wilson (2016)
Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fieldsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67
-
K. Akers (2017)
Introducing altmetrics to the Journal of the Medical Library AssociationJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 105
-
(2010)
altmetrics: a manifesto -
D. Torres-Salinas, Pedro-Ángel Castillo-Valdivieso, Álvaro Pérez-Luque, Esteban Romero-Frías (2018)
Altmétricas a nivel institucional: visibilidad en la Web de la producción científica de las universidades españolas a partir de Altmetric.comEl Profesional de la Información
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2019 ASIS&T
- ISSN
- 0044-7870
- eISSN
- 1550-8390
- DOI
- 10.1002/pra2.27
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Taking international LIS journals as an example, combining 8 traditional citation indicators and 10 altmetrics indicators, we use the method of multi‐indicator fusion to construct a comprehensive evaluation model of journal impact based on traditional citation indicators and altmetrics indicators. Through normalization processing, correlation analysis, reliability analysis, validity analysis, factor analysis, the paper evaluates the academic impact (FA), societal impact (FS) of LIS journals respectively. We get the following conclusion: (1) We get the 2‐dimensional evaluation results and according to LIS journals impacts, we divide the roles into four categories: “Prestige journals”, “Star journals”, “Common journals” and “Expert journals”. (2) It is found that 8 traditional citation indicators based on JCR, present strong positive correlations, and the indicators are highly consistent overall and internally. (3) There are moderate or high positive correlations among 10 altmetrics based on Altmetrics Explorer, and there are also significant consistency among the indicators as a whole and internally. (4) The correlation coefficient between FA and FS is 0.566, with a moderate positive correlation. It indicates that the evaluation of LIS journals' societal impact based on altmetrics indicators has a useful supplement to the evaluation of academic impact based on citation.
Journal
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science & Technology (Electronic) – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Keywords: ; ; ; ;