Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. H. R. Grisebach (1843)
Spicilegium Florae Rumelicae1
R. M. Polhill (1976)
Genisteae (Adans.)Benth. and related tribes (Leguminosae)Bot. Systematics, 1
W. Rothmaler (1944)
Die Gliederung der GattungCytisus LFeddes Repert., 53
(1908)
: P ~ eeherehes anatomiques sur la classification des Gengts et des Cytises
D. G. Frodin, V. H. Heywood (1968)
Flora Europaea2
W. Rothmaler (1944)
Die Gliederung der GattungCytisus L.Repertorium Novarum Specierum Regni Vegetabilis, 53
(1894)
Etudes sur les Cytises des Alpes Maritimes
G. Cristofolini, L. Chiapella (1970)
Chemotassonomia del genereSalicornia delle coste veneteGiorn. Bot. Ital., 104
R. Polhill (1978)
459) Proposal to Conserve and Retypify the Name Cytisus (Leguminosae)Taxon, 27
A. Holubová-Klásková (1964)
Bemerkungen zur Gliederung der GattungCytisus L. s.l.Acta Carol. Praha, Biol., suppl., 1964/2
G. Cristofolini, L. Chiapella (1970)
Chemotassonomia del Genere Salicornia Delle Coste VenetePlant Biosystems, 104
G. Cristofolini, L. Chiapella (1977)
SEROLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE TRIBE GENISTEAE (FABACEAE)Taxon, 26
P. Ascherson, P. Graebner
Synopsis der mitteleuropaïschen Flora, 1
H. Seal (1965)
Multivariate statistical analysis for biologists
F. Bisby, K. Nicholls (1977)
Effects of varying character definitions on classification of Genisteae (Leguminosae)Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 74
C. Koch (1869)
Dendrologie,1
O. Heinisch (1967)
Seal, H. L.: Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Biologists. Methuen & Co. Ltd. London 1964. XI + 207 S., Preis 45 sBiometrische Zeitschrift, 9
O. Ouchterlony (1968)
Handbook of Immunodiffusion and Immunoelectrophoresis
G. Cristofolini, L. Chiapella (1975)
Sistematica sierologica delleGenisteaeGiorn. Bot. Ital., 109
The serological reaction of seed proteins provides evidence for a partly new systematic arrangement ofCytisus sect.Trianthocytisus and ofCytisus s.l. Proposed modifications agree with recent advances in morphological taxonomy. Sect.Trianthocytisus includes only two species,C. villosus andC. aeolicus. Its position is central within the genus, and this fact agrees with the proposed retypification ofCytisus (type species:C. villosus).C. emeriflorus, formerly included in the same section, constitutes the monospecific sect.Emeroides, which is intermediate towards the genusLembotropis. This is serologically isolated and includes onlyL. nigricans. It is confirmed thatC. sessilifolius should be removed from the genusCytisus as a monospecific genus:Cytisophyllum Lang which is closely allied toHesperolaburnum and toPodocytisus, the most primitive genera ofGenisteae.
Plant Systematics and Evolution – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.