Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Figueiredo, G. Park, J. Figueiras, C. Farrar, K. Worden (2009)
Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets
H. Sohn, Seung Kim, K. Harries (2008)
Reference‐Free Damage Classification Based on Cluster AnalysisComputer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23
H. Sohn, C. Farrar, N. Hunter, K. Worden (2001)
Applying the LANL Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm for Structural Health Monitoring to Data from a Surface-Effect Fast Patrol Boat
G. Park, H. Sohn, C. Farrar, D. Inman (2003)
Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path ForwardThe Shock and Vibration Digest, 35
H. Kantz, T. Schreiber (2005)
Nonlinear Time Series AnalysisTechnometrics, 47
K. Worden, C. Farrar, G. Manson, G. Park (2007)
The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoringProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463
A. Rytter, R. Brincker, L. Hansen (1993)
Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures, 62
Chul-Young Kim, D. Jung, Nam-Sik Kim, Soon-Duck Kwon, M. Feng (2003)
Effect of vehicle weight on natural frequencies of bridges measured from traffic-induced vibrationEarthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2
I. Iervolino (2009)
Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure EngineeringComputer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
H. Sohn, C. Farrar, F. Hemez, Jerry Czarnecki (2002)
A Review of Structural Health Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature 1996-2001.
Yong Xia, H. Hao, G. Zanardo, A. Deeks (2006)
Long term vibration monitoring of an RC slab: Temperature and humidity effectEngineering Structures, 28
J. Bendat, A. Piersol (1987)
Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures
S. Alampalli (2000)
EFFECTS OF TESTING, ANALYSIS, DAMAGE, AND ENVIRONMENT ON MODAL PARAMETERSMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 14
(2004)
Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: II. Validation using riveted joints and repair
H. Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19
C. Farrar, S. Doebling, D. Nix (2001)
Vibration–based structural damage identificationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 359
Chul-YoungKim, Dae-SungJung, Nam-SikKim, Soon-DuckKwon (2003)
Effect of vehicle weight on natural frequencies of bridges measured from traffic-induced vibration, 2
A. Al-Smadi, D. Wilkes (2002)
Robust and accurate ARX and ARMA model order estimation of non-Gaussian processesIEEE Trans. Signal Process., 50
M. Pimentel, J. Santos (2008)
Safety appraisal of an existing bridge via detailed modelling
B. Moaveni, Xianfei He, J. Conte, R. Callafon (2008)
Damage Identification of a Composite Beam Using Finite Element Model UpdatingComputer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23
B. Peeters, G. Roeck (2001)
One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage eventsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30
Moaveni Moaveni, He He, Conte Conte (2008)
Damage identification of a composite beam based on changes of modal parametersComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23
S. Soyoz, M. Feng (2009)
Long‐Term Monitoring and Identification of Bridge Structural ParametersComputer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24
C. Farrar, K. Worden, M. Todd, G. Park, J. Nichols, D. Adams, M. Bement, K. Farinholt (2007)
Nonlinear System Identification for Damage Detection
(2008)
Damage identification of a composite beam based on changes of modal parameters, Computer-Aided
Peter Young, S. Shellswell (1972)
Time series analysis, forecasting and controlIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 17
S. Doebling, C. Farrar, M. Prime, D. Shevitz (1996)
Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review
C. Farrar, P. Cornwell, S. Doebling, M. Prime (2000)
Structural Health Monitoring Studies of the Alamosa Canyon and I-40 Bridges
(1993)
Vibration based on inspections of civil engineering structures, PhD dissertation, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Alborg University, Denmark
J. Ihn, F. Chang (2004)
Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: II. Validation using riveted joints and repair patchesSmart Materials and Structures, 13
J. Ko, Y. Ni (2005)
Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridgesEngineering Structures, 27
T. Cassar, K. Camilleri, S. Fabri (2009)
Order Estimation of Computational Models for Dynamic Systems with Application to Biomedical Signals2009 Third International Conference on Advanced Engineering Computing and Applications in Sciences
Abstract: An important step for using time‐series autoregressive (AR) models for structural health monitoring is the estimation of the appropriate model order. To obtain an optimal AR model order for such processes, this article presents and discusses four techniques based on Akaike information criterion, partial autocorrelation function, root mean squared error, and singular value decomposition. A unique contribution of this work is to provide a comparative study with three different AR models that is carried out to understand the influence of the model order on the damage detection process in the presence of simulated operational and environmental variability. A three‐story base‐excited frame structure was used as a test bed in a laboratory setting, and data sets were measured for several structural state conditions. Damage was introduced by a bumper mechanism that induces a repetitive impact‐type nonlinearity. The operational and environmental effects were simulated by adding mass and by changing the stiffness properties of the columns. It was found that these four techniques do not converge to a unique solution, rather all require somewhat qualitative interpretation to define the optimal model order. The comparative study carried out on these data sets shows that the AR model order range defined by the four techniques provides robust damage detection in the presence of simulated operational and environmental variability.
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.