Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The practicalities of issuing vote advice: a new methodology for profiling and matching

The practicalities of issuing vote advice: a new methodology for profiling and matching What methods are used and what methodological issues are involved when Vote Advice Applications (VAAs) compare voter and party policy stances? This paper examines these questions by describing a newly developed methodology to code party positions on salient political issues, combing expert–judgements based on text analysis with self–placement of parties. This paper also reflects on methodologies used by VAA developers to identify salient issues and discusses how these issues are reframed into statements to which users of these online tools are asked to respond, as well as how relevant party documentation is identified and how these textual sources are used to calibrate political parties on the issues. Finally, the paper outlines some of the methodological problems that occur when scientists seek to aggregate voters' opinions into an easy–to–understand output representing their position in a political landscape relative to the policy positions of competing parties. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Electronic Governance Inderscience Publishers

The practicalities of issuing vote advice: a new methodology for profiling and matching

Loading next page...
 
/lp/inderscience-publishers/the-practicalities-of-issuing-vote-advice-a-new-methodology-for-0dLbevHe1g

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. All rights reserved
ISSN
1742-7509
eISSN
1742-7517
DOI
10.1504/IJEG.2012.051308
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

What methods are used and what methodological issues are involved when Vote Advice Applications (VAAs) compare voter and party policy stances? This paper examines these questions by describing a newly developed methodology to code party positions on salient political issues, combing expert–judgements based on text analysis with self–placement of parties. This paper also reflects on methodologies used by VAA developers to identify salient issues and discusses how these issues are reframed into statements to which users of these online tools are asked to respond, as well as how relevant party documentation is identified and how these textual sources are used to calibrate political parties on the issues. Finally, the paper outlines some of the methodological problems that occur when scientists seek to aggregate voters' opinions into an easy–to–understand output representing their position in a political landscape relative to the policy positions of competing parties.

Journal

International Journal of Electronic GovernanceInderscience Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.