All-Suture Anchors in Orthopaedic Surgery: Design, Rationale, Biomechanical Data, and Clinical Outcomes
All-Suture Anchors in Orthopaedic Surgery: Design, Rationale, Biomechanical Data, and Clinical...
Trofa, David P.; Bixby, Elise C.; Fleischli, James E.; Saltzman, Bryan M.
2021-10-01 00:00:00
All-suture anchors (ASAs) are a relatively new alternative to traditional suture anchors, comprised of sutures, suture tapes, or ribbons woven through a soft sleeve. These novel anchors are typically smaller than traditional anchors, allowing for more anchors to be used in the same amount of space or for use when bone stock is limited, for example, in revision settings. They can be inserted through curved guides to reach more challenging locations, and they have thus far had similar loads to failure during biomechanical testing as traditional anchors. However, these benefits must be weighed against new challenges. When using ASAs, care must be taken to fully deploy and seat the anchor against cortical bone for optimal fixation and to prevent gap formation. Furthermore, decortication, often performed to enhance the biologic environment for soft-tissue healing, may weaken the cortical bone on which ASA fixation depends on. The purpose of this article is to provide insight on the designs, advantages, and potential disadvantages associated with ASAs, as well as review the available biomechanical and clinical data.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsWolters Kluwer Healthhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/all-suture-anchors-in-orthopaedic-surgery-design-rationale-0dGferIrMN
All-Suture Anchors in Orthopaedic Surgery: Design, Rationale, Biomechanical Data, and Clinical Outcomes
All-suture anchors (ASAs) are a relatively new alternative to traditional suture anchors, comprised of sutures, suture tapes, or ribbons woven through a soft sleeve. These novel anchors are typically smaller than traditional anchors, allowing for more anchors to be used in the same amount of space or for use when bone stock is limited, for example, in revision settings. They can be inserted through curved guides to reach more challenging locations, and they have thus far had similar loads to failure during biomechanical testing as traditional anchors. However, these benefits must be weighed against new challenges. When using ASAs, care must be taken to fully deploy and seat the anchor against cortical bone for optimal fixation and to prevent gap formation. Furthermore, decortication, often performed to enhance the biologic environment for soft-tissue healing, may weaken the cortical bone on which ASA fixation depends on. The purpose of this article is to provide insight on the designs, advantages, and potential disadvantages associated with ASAs, as well as review the available biomechanical and clinical data.
Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
– Wolters Kluwer Health
Published: Oct 1, 2021
Recommended Articles
Loading...
References
The history of suture anchors in orthopaedic surgery
Visscher, LE; Jeffery, C; Gilmour, T; Anderson, L; Couzens, G
Comparison of clinical outcomes and computed tomography analysis for tunnel diameter after arthroscopic Bankart repair with the all-suture anchor and the biodegradable suture anchor
Lee, JH; Park, I; Hyun, HS; Kim, SW; Shin, SJ
Triple labrum tears repaired with the JuggerKnot soft anchor: Technique and results
Agrawal, V; Pietrzak, WS
Arthroscopic glenoid labral lesion repair using all-suture anchor for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: Short-term results
Gül, O; Okutan, AE; Ayas, MS
Radiological and clinical outcome of arthroscopic labral repair with all-suture anchors
Willemot, L; Elfadalli, R; Jaspars, KC
All-suture anchor settling after arthroscopic repair of small and medium rotator cuff tears
Ro, K; Rhee, SM; Kim, JY
Perianchor cyst formation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using all-suture–type, bioabsorbable-type, and PEEK-type anchors
Ro, K; Pancholi, S; Son, HS; Rhee, YG
Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors: A midterm magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of repair integrity and cyst formation
Van der Bracht, H; Van den Langenbergh, T; Pouillon, M; Verhasselt, S; Verniers, P; Stoffelen, D
Mid-term clinical outcome following rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors
Dhinsa, BS; Bhamra, JS; Aramberri-Gutierrez, M; Kochhar, T
Double on-lay fixation using all suture-type anchor for subpectoral biceps tenodesis has favorable functional outcomes and leads to less cosmetic deformities than single on-lay fixation
Rhee, SM; Jeong, HY; Ro, K; Pancholi, S; Rhee, YG
Biomechanical evaluation of knotless and knotted all-suture anchor repair constructs in 4 Bankart repair configurations
Lacheta, L; Brady, A; Rosenberg, SI
Biomechanical comparison of traditional anchors to all-suture anchors in a double-row rotator cuff repair cadaver model
Goschka, AM; Hafer, JS; Reynolds, KA
Analysis of glenoid inter-anchor distance with an all-suture anchor system
Kramer, JD; Robinson, S; Purviance, C; Montgomery, W
All-suture anchors: Biomechanical analysis of pullout strength, displacement, and failure mode
Barber, FA; Herbert, MA
Pullout strength of all suture anchors in the repair of rotator cuff tears: A biomechanical study
Biomechanical evaluation of a transtendinous all-suture anchor technique versus interference screw technique for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis in a cadaveric model
Biomechanical comparison of onlay distal biceps tendon repair: All-suture anchors versus titanium suture anchors
Otto, A; Mehl, J; Obopilwe, E
Biomechanical in vitro validation of intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair: A new technique
Siebenlist, S; Lenich, A; Buchholz, A
Biomechanical evaluation of proximal hamstring repair: All-suture anchor versus titanium suture anchor
Otto, A; DiCosmo, AM; Baldino, JB
Cyclic and load to failure properties of all-suture anchors in synthetic acetabular and glenoid cancellous bone
Douglass, NP; Behn, AW; Safran, MR
Acetabular all-suture anchor for labral repair: Incidence of intraoperative failure due to pullout
Byrd, JWT; Jones, KS; Loring, CL; Sparks, SL
Greater tuberosity decortication decreases load to failure of all-suture anchor constructs in rotator cuff repair
Ruder, JA; Dickinson, EY; Peindl, RD; Habet, NA; Fleischli, JE
Biomechanical effects of position and angle of insertion for all-suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair
Lee, JH; Itami, Y; Hedayati, B
Pullout strength of all-suture anchors: Effect of the insertion and traction angle-A biomechanical study
Oh, JH; Jeong, HJ; Yang, SH
The formation of perianchor fluid associated with various suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair: All-suture, polyetheretherketone, and biocomposite anchors
Kim, SH; Yang, SH; Rhee, SM; Lee, KJ; Kim, HS; Oh, JH
Postoperative recurrence of instability due to new anterior glenoid rim fractures after arthroscopic Bankart repair
Nakagawa, S; Hirose, T; Tachibana, Y; Iuchi, R; Mae, T
Pullout strength and failure mode of industrially manufactured and self-made all-suture anchors: A biomechanical analysis
Godry, H; Jettkant, B; Seybold, D; Venjakob, AJ; Bockmann, B
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
