Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1993)
Pain measurement
W. Makarowski, A. Weaver, Bernard Rubin, Jacques Caldwell, F. Mcmahon, Robert Noveck, David Lee, Howard Offenberg, Marshall Sack, David Sikes, Robert Trapp, Susan Rush, Michael Kuss, Jitendra Ganju, Tomas Bocanegra, James Ratliff (1996)
The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 1200 mg/d of oxaprozin and 1500 mg/d of nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.Clinical therapeutics, 18 1
W Downie, P. Leatham, V. Rhind, V. Wright, J Branco, J Anderson (1978)
Studies with pain rating scales.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 37
Roy Altman (1991)
Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis.The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement, 27
(March, 1993)
The efficacy and safety of oxaprozin versus piroxicam: Pooled results of double-blind trials in osteoarthritis, 23
(1994)
Statistical inference
E. Grossi, C. Borghi, E. Cerchiari, T. Puppa, B. Francucci (1983)
Analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS): a new method for pain assessment.Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 1 4
Nicholas Bellamy, S. Kaloni, Janet Pope, K. Coulter, Jane Campbell (1998)
Quantitative rheumatology: a survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Canada.The Journal of rheumatology, 25 5
(1992)
The McGill pain questionnaire: Appraisal and current status
D. Bieri, R. Reeve, G. Champion, L. Addicoat, J. Ziegler (1990)
The faces pain scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale propertiesPain, 41
Nicholas Bellamy, K. Muirden, Peter Brooks, David Barraclough, M. Tellus, Jane Campbell (1999)
A survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Australia.The Journal of rheumatology, 26 7
E. Huskisson (1974)
Measurement of pain.Lancet, 2 7889
C. Bombardier, J. Ware, I. Russell, M. Larson, A. Chalmers, J. Read, W. Arnold, R. Bennett, J. Caldwell, P. Hench, W. Lages, Matthew Liang, C. Ludivico, G. Morgan, M. O'Hanlan, P. Schur, R. Sheon, Thomas Taylor, B. Mcneil, S. Pauker, G. Torrance, M. Thompson (1986)
Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial.The American journal of medicine, 81 4
A. Frank, J. Moll, J. Hort (1982)
A comparison of three ways of measuring pain.Rheumatology and rehabilitation, 21 4
Nicholas Bellamy, R. Sothern, Jane Campbell, W. Buchanan (1991)
Circadian rhythm in pain, stiffness, and manual dexterity in rheumatoid arthritis: relation between discomfort and disability.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 50
(1994)
Comparing two groups - the f-test
Arthur Weaver, Bernard Rubin, Jacques Caldwell, F.Gilbert McMahon, David Lee, W. Makarowski, Howard Offenberg, Marshall Sack, David Sikes, Robert Trapp, Susan Rush, Michael Kuss, Jitendra Ganju, Tomas Bocanegra (1995)
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oxaprozin and nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.Clinical therapeutics, 17 4
SummaryAlthough progress has been made in the clinical metrology of pain in osteoarthritis, much further work remains. The preferred methods of measurement remain debatable. In this longitudinal, open study, a comparison of eight self-rating pain scales has been conducted. A total of 333 patients entered the four-week study after completing a 3-7 day NSAID-free washout period. Patients were assigned to treatment with oxaprozin 1200 mg p.o. once daily with titration permitted between 600 mg and 1800 mg. Rescue analgesia with acetaminophen (paracetamol) 325 mg (maximum 2600 mg) was allowed. At the end of the washout and the treatment period, patients completed eight self-administered pain scales.All pain measures detected clinically important and statistically significant improvements in pain. The pain scales differed in their degree of responsiveness. The Likert and visual analogue scales and their primary variations (continuous chromatic analogue and numerical scales) were more responsive than more complex measures. A positive correlation between initial pain rating and subsequent pain relief was confirmed in this study.We conclude that, while pain is a subjective sensory phenomenon, its perceived severity can be evaluated using a variety of self-administered pain scales, all of which are capable of detecting improvements in health status following effective pharmacological intervention.
Current Medical Research & Opinion – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 1, 1999
Keywords: Osteoarthritis; Pain; Outcome measurement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.