Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Silver (1985)
Mouse t haplotypes.Annual review of genetics, 19
L. Stickel (1979)
Population ecology of house mice in unstable habitats
(1981)
Does group selection occur in commensal house mice (Mus domesticus)? Pp. 197-213 in B. Shorrocks and
A. Ruvinsky, A. Polyakov, A. Agulnik, H. Tichy, F. Figueroa, J. Klein (1991)
Low diversity of t haplotypes in the eastern form of the house mouse, Mus musculus L.Genetics, 127 1
J. Klein (1975)
Biology of the Mouse Histocompatibility-2 Complex
P. Franks, S. Lenington (1986)
Dominance and reproductive behaviour of wild house mice in a semi‐natural environment correlated with T‐locus genotype, 18
R. Lewontin, L. Dunn (1960)
The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse.Genetics, 45 6
R. Berry (1968)
The Ecology of an Island Population of the House MouseJournal of Animal Ecology, 37
J. Reimer, M. Petras (1967)
Breeding structure of the house mouse, Mus musculus, in a population cage.Journal of mammalogy, 48 1
M. Slatkin (1985)
Gene Flow in Natural PopulationsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 16
M. Slatkin, N. Barton (1989)
A COMPARISON OF THREE INDIRECT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AVERAGE LEVELS OF GENE FLOWEvolution, 43
P. Anderson, L. Dunn, A. Beasley (1964)
Introduction of a Lethal Allele into a Feral House Mouse PopulationThe American Naturalist, 98
L. Drickamer (1986)
Puberty-Influencing Chemosignals in House Mice: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations
G. Gerlach (1990)
Dispersal mechanisms in a captive wild house mouse population (Mus domesticus Rutty)Biological Journal of The Linnean Society, 41
S. Wright (1931)
Evolution in mendelian populationsBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 52
J. Nadeau, D. Varnum, D. Burkart (1989)
Genetic evidence for two t complex tail interaction (tct) loci in t haplotypes.Genetics, 122 4
J. Britton-davidian, J. Nadeau, H. Croset, L. Thaler (1989)
Genic differentiation and origin of Robertsonian populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Rutty).Genetical research, 53 1
(1931)
The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings ofthe Intern
L. Nunney (1991)
The influence of age structure and fecundity on effective population sizeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 246
G. Gummere, P. McCormick, D. Bennett (1986)
The influence of genetic background and the homologous chromosome 17 on t-haplotype transmission ratio distortion in mice.Genetics, 114 1
A. E. M. Baker (1990)
Does group selection occur in commensal house mice (Mus domesticus)?
J. W. Gallagher (1969)
Polymorphism at the T‐locus in Mus musculus: alternative hypotheses for low observed frequencies of t
(1969)
Polymorphism at the T-Iocus in Mus musculus: alternative hypotheses for low observed frequencies of t. Master's' thesis
R. Strecker (1953)
Regulatory Mechanisms in House-Mouse Populations: The Effect of Limited Food Supply on an Unconfined PopulationEcology, 34
C. Delarbre, Y. Kashi, P. Boursot, J. Beckmann, P. Kourilsky, F. Bonhomme, G. Gachelin (1988)
Phylogenetic distribution in the genus Mus of t-complex-specific DNA and protein markers: inferences on the origin of t-haplotypes.Molecular biology and evolution, 5 2
S. Wright (1950)
Genetical structure of populations.Nature, 166 4215
(1987)
Population dynamics of small rodents in farm buildings on arable land in Europe
A. Baker, M. Petras (1986)
The fate of Mus domesticus demes after destruction of their habitatsBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 29
(1978)
Dynamics of t - alleles in Mus musculus populations : review and speculation
J. Vandenbergh (1987)
Regulation of Puberty and Its Consequences on Population Dynamics of MiceIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 27
J. Vandenbergh, D. Coppola (1986)
The Physiology and Ecology of Puberty Modulation by Primer PheromonesAdvances in The Study of Behavior, 16
L. Nunney (1993)
THE INFLUENCE OF MATING SYSTEM AND OVERLAPPING GENERATIONS ON EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZEEvolution, 47
David Bruck (1957)
MALE SEGREGATION RATIO ADVANTAGE AS A FACTOR IN MAINTAINING LETHAL ALLELES IN WILD POPULATIONS OF HOUSE MICE.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 43 1
L. Dunn, A. Beasley, H. Tinker (1958)
Relative Fitness of Wild House Mice Heterozygous for a Lethal AlleleThe American Naturalist, 92
F. Evans (1949)
A Population Study of House Mice (Mus musculus) Following a Period of Local AbundanceJournal of Mammalogy, 30
M. Wade, D. Mccauley (1988)
EXTINCTION AND RECOLONIZATION: THEIR EFFECTS ON THE GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF LOCAL POPULATIONSEvolution, 42
C. Cannings, A. Edwards (1969)
Expected genotypic frequencies in a small sample: deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.American journal of human genetics, 21 3
P. Pennycuik, P. Johnston, N. Westwood, A. Reisner (1986)
VARIATION IN NUMBERS IN A HOUSE MOUSE POPULATION HOUSED IN A LARGE OUTDOOR ENCLOSURE: SEASONAL FLUCTUATIONSJournal of Animal Ecology, 55
E. Laurie (1946)
The reproduction of the house-mouse (Mus musculus) living in different environmentsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences, 133
Drickamer Lc, Meikle Db (1988)
Food deprivation affects reproduction in adult female mice (Mus musculus) and the age of puberty for their female progeny.Acta Biologica Hungarica, 39
G. R. Singleton, D. A. Hay (1983)
The effect of social organization on reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of wild house mice, Mus musculus, 12
S. Lenington (1991)
The t complex : a story of genes, behavior, and populationsAdvances in The Study of Behavior, 20
M. Petras, J. Topping (1981)
Studies of Natural Populations of Mus. vi. Sizes of Populations Inhabiting Corn Cribs in Southwestern OntarioJournal of Mammalogy, 62
BY Bronson (1979)
The Reproductive Ecology of the House MouseThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 54
Baker (1990)
197
M. Hammer (1991)
Molecular and Chromosomal Studies on the Origin of t Haplotypes in MiceThe American Naturalist, 137
Bronson Fh (1984)
The adaptability of the house mouse.Scientific American, 250
B. Levin, M. Petras, D. Rasmussen (1969)
The Effect of Migration on the Maintenance of a Lethal Polymorphism in the House MouseThe American Naturalist, 103
M. Wade (1985)
Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group SelectionThe American Naturalist, 125
R. Lewontin (1962)
Interdeme Selection Controlling a Polymorphism in the House MouseThe American Naturalist, 96
Cannings (1969)
245American Journal of Human Genetics, 21
W. Lidicker (1976)
Social Behaviour and Density Regulation in House Mice Living in Large EnclosuresJournal of Animal Ecology, 45
L. Drickamer (1987)
Behavioral Aspects of Rodent Population BiologyIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 27
F. Rowe, R. Quy, T. Swinney (1987)
Recolonization of the buildings on a farm by house miceActa Theriologica, 32
T. Clutton‐Brock (1989)
Reproductive success : studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systemsThe Condor, 91
M. Petras (1967)
STUDIES OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF MUS. I. BIOCHEMICAL POLYMORPHISMS AND THEIR BEARING ON BREEDING STRUCTUREEvolution, 21
(1987)
Patterns of dispersal and genetic structure in populations of small rodents
G. Triggs (1991)
The population ecology of house mice (Mus domesticus) on the Isle of May, ScotlandJournal of Zoology, 225
A. Baker (1981)
GENE FLOW IN HOUSE MICE: INTRODUCTION OF A NEW ALLELE INTO FREE‐LIVING POPULATIONSEvolution, 35
L. Dunn (1957)
Studies of the Genetic Variability in Populations of Wild House Mice. II. Analysis of Eight Additional Alleles at Locus T.Genetics, 42 3
R. Sage (1981)
Wild mice, 1
F. Bronson (1982)
Relative effects of exercise, diet, and female stimulation on sexual aging of male mice.Journal of gerontology, 37 5
K. Petrusewicz, R. Andrzejewski (1962)
Natural history of a free‐living population of house mice (Mus musculus Linnaeus), with particular reference to groupings within the population, 10
J. Craig (1990)
Viable populations for conservationJournal of The Royal Society of New Zealand, 20
S. Waelsch (1989)
In praise of complexity.Genetics, 122 4
M. Slatkin (1977)
Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions.Theoretical population biology, 12 3
S. Lenington, P. Franks, J. Williams (1988)
Distribution of T-Haplotypes in Natural Populations of Wild House MiceJournal of Mammalogy, 69
D. Bennett (1975)
The T-locus of the mouseCell, 6
M. Erhart, S. Phillips, F. Bonhomme, P. Boursot, E. Wakeland, J. Nadeau (1989)
Haplotypes that are mosaic for wild-type and t complex-specific alleles in wild mice.Genetics, 123 2
L. Silver, M. Hammer, H. Fox, J. Garrels, M. Bucan, B. Herrmann, A. Frischauf, H. Lehrach, H. Winking, F. Figueroa (1987)
Molecular evidence for the rapid propagation of mouse t haplotypes from a single, recent, ancestral chromosome.Molecular biology and evolution, 4 5
J. Britton-davidian (1990)
Genic differentiation in M.m. domesticus populations from europe, the Middle East and North Africa : geographic patterns and colonization eventsBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 41
S. Lenington, I. Heisler (1991)
Behavioral Reduction in the Transmission of Deleterious t Haplotypes by Wild House MiceThe American Naturalist, 137
T. Morita, H. Kubota, K. Murata, M. Nozaki, Christiane Delarbrei, K. Willison, Y. Satta, Mitsuru Sakaizumiii, N. Takahata, Gabriel GACHELINf, A. Matsushiro (1992)
Evolution of the mouse t haplotype: recent and worldwide introgression to Mus musculus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89 15
M. Petras, J. Topping (1983)
The maintenance of polymorphisms at two loci in house mouse (Mus musculus) populations.Canadian journal of genetics and cytology. Journal canadien de genetique et de cytologie, 25 2
M. Hammer, S. Bliss, L. Silver (1991)
Genetic exchange across a paracentric inversion of the mouse t complex.Genetics, 128 4
J. Pelikan (1981)
Patterns of reproduction in the house mouse, 47
S. Wright (1932)
The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution, 6
W. Walkowa, K. Adamczyk, Henryka Chełkowska (1989)
Characteristics of migrants in a free-living population of the house mouseActa Theriologica, 34
F. Figueroa, E. Neufeld, U. Ritte, J. Klein (1988)
t-Specific DNA polymorphisms among wild mice from Israel and Spain.Genetics, 119 1
S. Lenington (1983)
Social preferences for partners carrying ‘good genes’ in wild house miceAnimal Behaviour, 31
P. Martin, H. Andrewartha (1962)
Success in Fighting of Two Varieties of MiceThe American Naturalist, 96
(1984)
Spatial activity of small mammals (Rodentia) in areas oflarge-scale livestock production farms
The t‐lethal haplotypes (t) found in house mouse (Mus musculus) populations are recessive lethals favored by gametic selection whereby male heterozygotes exhibit a non‐Mendelian transmission ratio of about 95% t. The expected equilibrium frequency is 0.385; however, empirical values are lower, averaging close to 0.13. We examined the hypothesis that interdemic selection is the cause of the low empirical values by using a deme‐structured simulation model that included overlapping generations, a realistic breeding system, differential deme productivity, and a large total population. We found that under some conditions interdemic selection could lower t frequency below 0.13 in the face of immigration rates up to 5%. Low frequencies were correlated with effective deme size (ne), regardless of whether ne was changed through changing deme size (n) or through changing the proportion of breeding adults. Earlier workers showed how the first two phases of interdemic selection (random genetic differentiation and mass selection) interacted to reduce the haplotype frequency, but here we show the importance of the third phase (differential productivity of demes) once demes are linked by dispersal. The effect of this phase is not due to the (negative) covariation between deme productivity and haplotype frequency, but occurs when differential deme productivity generates a difference in t frequency between the population of juveniles recruited into their natal deme and the population of juvenile dispersers. This difference was maximized when the average productivity of demes was low, either because few adult females bred at any one time and/or because fecundity was low. Contrary to an earlier prediction, male‐biased dispersal also reduced haplotype frequency, and this probably stems from the relative excess of wild‐type genotypes among dispersers compared to the deme residents. Another unexpected finding was that the randomly generated excess of heterozygotes (FIS < 0) found in small demes favored t haplotypes; however, the effect was only seen when the more powerful influence of the third phase of interdemic selection was removed. Simulations of neutral polymorphisms showed that a deme structure giving FST ≤ 0.6 is inconsistent with a haplotype frequency below 0.13. Based on current empirical estimates of FST (about 0.2), we concluded that immigration rates in the field are too high for interdemic selection alone to cause the observed deficit of lethal haplotypes. One factor that could combine with population structure effects is the observation that the transmission ratio is lowered to around 0.6 in litters produced from postpartum estrus (PPE). Incorporating this factor, we showed that interdemic selection could be effective in lowering the frequency of t below 0.13 when FST was above 0.43 even when migration rates were up to 10%. These results suggest that if empirical haplotype and FST estimates are accurate, then additional factors such as a lowered fitness of heterozygotes may be involved.
Evolution – Oxford University Press
Published: Oct 1, 1993
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.