Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Stockdale, A. Findlay, D. Short (2000)
The Re-population of Rural Scotland: Opportunities and Threats. Journal of Rural Studies
S. Lee (1986)
Law and Morals
(1999)
Why Buy Organic
(2000)
The Organic Food and Farming Report 2000
I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein (1980)
Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
(1999)
Working Together for the Food Chain: Views from the Food Chain Group
H. A. Michener, J. D. DeLamater (1994)
Social Psychology
S. Blackburn (2001)
Being Good: A Short Introduction to Ethics
(1999)
The Changing Consumer
(1999)
Foods for Thought
(1911)
Protection of Animals Act (as Amended)
A. Weston (2001)
A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox
M. G. McEachern, A. Tregear (2000)
Farm Animal Welfare in the UK: A Comparison of Assurance Schemes. Farm Management
(2000)
Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary
N. Lampkin, M. Measures (1995)
Organic Farm Management Handbook
J. J. Macionis, K. Plummer (1997)
Sociology
M. B. Holbrook (1999)
Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research
This study examines the specificvalues held by consumers towards organic andconventionally produced meat, with particularreference to moral issues surrounding foodanimal production. A quota sample of 30 femalesfrom both a rural and an urban area of Scotland(UK), were interviewed. Overall, there was lowcommitment towards the purchase of organicmeats and little concern for ethical issues.Price and product appearance were the primarymeat selection criteria, the latter being usedas a predictor of eating quality. Manyattitude-behavior anomalies were identified,mainly as a result of respondents' cognitivedissonance and lack of understanding regardingmeat production criteria underpinning meatquality marks, e.g., Soil Association label.Responsibilities for ethical issues appeared tobe delegated by the consumer to the meatretailer or government. This raises issuesabout educating consumers and bringingconsumers closer to understanding meatproduction systems. A conceptual framework isproposed that illustrates the significance ofconsumer involvement in how meat-purchasingdecisions are approached in terms of theevaluation of tangible and or intangiblequality attributes. The results also point tothe need for further research into thoseaspects of quality that individuals tend toaddress at the level of the citizen (law),rather than at the point of purchase.
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 13, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.