Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE INTERPLAY OF FACILITATION AND COMPETITION IN PLANT COMMUNITIES

THE INTERPLAY OF FACILITATION AND COMPETITION IN PLANT COMMUNITIES If plants cannot simultaneously acclimate to shade and drought because of physiological trade‐offs, then plants are expected to be less tolerant to shading under drier conditions. One observation that, at first sight, seems incompatible with this idea is the fact that the establishment of new plants in dry areas is often restricted to shady sites under the canopy of other plants, called “nurse plants.” We use a graphical model to resolve this paradox. The model visualizes how facilitative patterns can be understood from the simultaneous effects of plant canopies on microsite light and moisture, and the growth responses of establishing seedlings to those factors. The approach emphasizes the fact that positive and negative effects of plant canopies always occur simultaneously. In the presented light–water model, facilitation only occurs when the improvement of plant water relations under the canopy exceeds the costs caused by lower light levels. This may be true under dry conditions, whereas in less dry situations, competition rather than facilitation is observed. The model shows how changes in water availability may shift interactions from competitive to facilitative and vice versa, as observed in some field patterns. It is argued that other environmental factors explaining facilitative patterns can be understood in the same context. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecology Wiley

THE INTERPLAY OF FACILITATION AND COMPETITION IN PLANT COMMUNITIES

Holmgren, Milena; Scheffer, Marten; Huston, Michael A.
Ecology , Volume 78 (7) – Oct 1, 1997
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-interplay-of-facilitation-and-competition-in-plant-communities-0CUlm46bu5

References (95)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
"© Society for Community Research and Action"
ISSN
0012-9658
eISSN
1939-9170
DOI
10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1966:TIOFAC]2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

If plants cannot simultaneously acclimate to shade and drought because of physiological trade‐offs, then plants are expected to be less tolerant to shading under drier conditions. One observation that, at first sight, seems incompatible with this idea is the fact that the establishment of new plants in dry areas is often restricted to shady sites under the canopy of other plants, called “nurse plants.” We use a graphical model to resolve this paradox. The model visualizes how facilitative patterns can be understood from the simultaneous effects of plant canopies on microsite light and moisture, and the growth responses of establishing seedlings to those factors. The approach emphasizes the fact that positive and negative effects of plant canopies always occur simultaneously. In the presented light–water model, facilitation only occurs when the improvement of plant water relations under the canopy exceeds the costs caused by lower light levels. This may be true under dry conditions, whereas in less dry situations, competition rather than facilitation is observed. The model shows how changes in water availability may shift interactions from competitive to facilitative and vice versa, as observed in some field patterns. It is argued that other environmental factors explaining facilitative patterns can be understood in the same context.

Journal

Ecology – Wiley

Published: Oct 1, 1997

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.